Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

Rear Transmission Mount

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2004 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
tomatocity's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 175
From: Sacramento, CA 95820 USA
Rear Transmission Mount

Today I replaced the rear transmission mount. Since I purchased the car in February I had occassionally ehard thumping noises when I went over bumps and dips. Checked for similar information here at camaroz28.com and decided it was a broken rear transmission mount. I decided on the GM replacement mount, PN 22201140, because of the possibility of vibration when using a polyurethane mount. There has been talk about a difference in height of the newer mounts and what to do to compensate for the change in pinion angle. I came across a different concern. When inspecting the underside of teh car the first time I changed oil I noticed the exhaust was very close to the X-Brace and thought this to be strange but it did not seem to be a problem. After I removed the original rear mount I set it next to the new rear mount and discovered there was at least a 1/2" difference in height plus the original rear mount was not broken. After I installed the new rear mount I realized the exhaust had been too close to the X-Brace. The thumping noise was most likely coming from the exhaust hitting the X-Bracket. If I did not want to spend the money on a new rear mount I could have been cured the problem by adding spacers between the X-Brace and the body. I took pictures. If anyone would like to see the difference just pmail me and I will send them. If someone has a page they would like to add these pictures to, let me know and I will send thetm to you. Time to change clothes and test the new rear mount.
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 07:56 PM
  #2  
teke184's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 8,319
From: US 1 Mile Marker 52 in the Florida Keys
Re: Rear Transmission Mount

just because it doesn't look broke doesn't mean it wasn't worn out.

i iinstalled the poly mount and noticed very minimal vibration, and i already had poly motor mounts and poly bushings on most of the suspension.
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 09:45 PM
  #3  
tomatocity's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 175
From: Sacramento, CA 95820 USA
Re: Rear Transmission Mount

Originally Posted by teke184
just because it doesn't look broke doesn't mean it wasn't worn out.

i iinstalled the poly mount and noticed very minimal vibration, and i already had poly motor mounts and poly bushings on most of the suspension.
having the extra space between the exhaust and the X-Brace makes me feel better. I tested it and can't get it to thump. If it breaks I will try the poly mount.
Old Aug 26, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #4  
Xride's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Re: Rear Transmission Mount

the rear mount is the only mount.

and your list, of posi, and 2.73 kinda go with the LT1 and the 4L60E
and listing your stock rear mount is just weird
Old Aug 27, 2004 | 01:44 AM
  #5  
tomatocity's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 175
From: Sacramento, CA 95820 USA
Re: Rear Transmission Mount

Originally Posted by Xride
the rear mount is the only mount.

and your list, of posi, and 2.73 kinda go with the LT1 and the 4L60E
and listing your stock rear mount is just weird
The rear mount is listed as a change (correction / repair) and not meant to be something I necessarily added for performance. When I research things I want to add or change I also look at the users signatures to see what they have done. In the case of the rear mount there are three choices, an older and lower in height mount if you can find one, a poly mount, and the newer and taller (PN 22201140) mount. Hopefully this can help a newby like me make an decision. Listening (and reading) to Injuneer and Shoebox has helped me tons. Hopefully we are all here to share information and be helpful to each other.
Old Aug 27, 2004 | 01:55 AM
  #6  
Xride's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Re: Rear Transmission Mount

Originally Posted by tomatocity
The rear mount is listed as a change (correction / repair) and not meant to be something I necessarily added for performance. When I research things I want to add or change I also look at the users signatures to see what they have done. In the case of the rear mount there are three choices, an older and lower in height mount if you can find one, a poly mount, and the newer and taller (PN 22201140) mount. Hopefully this can help a newby like me make an decision. Listening (and reading) to Injuneer and Shoebox has helped me tons. Hopefully we are all here to share information and be helpful to each other.

A search is much more effective for information then a signature is.

By your reasoning everyone should put their new oil filter numbers, replacement shocks, window motors, door seals, and the list goes on.
But I'm not saying your cant, its your sig. and I dont mean to question it. jsut struck me as odd.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
Jul 30, 2017 11:46 AM
Jazsun
Cars For Sale
0
Dec 29, 2014 12:14 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.