Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

Less vacuum means get better brakes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 03:10 PM
  #1  
NVRLATE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 203
From: Olathe, KS
Less vacuum means get better brakes?

I have decent size cam and have already installed a vacuum canister. I saw no improvement in brake response after installing the canister. Can poor braking be corrected with better brakes? If so which ones are the best value (i.e. LS1, C5, Willwood, Baer, etc...)?
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 05:39 PM
  #2  
OBE1 95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 4,950
From: San Diego, CA
Re: Less vacuum means get better brakes?

In my opinion the 93 - 97 cars came with marginal brakes from the factory, even if you haven't messed with the vacuum assist. The LS1 cars stepped up to a bigger rotor (12" vs 11"). There are salvage yards selling LS1 conversion parts for around $350. I went with a Baer Track Kit with 13" rotors and dual piston calipers; the Baer Kit run around $700 - $750.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CheckOutMyRoost
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
1
May 31, 2015 10:40 AM
Nellsw88
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
May 27, 2015 10:27 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
May 1, 2015 01:14 PM
grgguy
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
17
Feb 23, 2015 07:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.