Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

Adj vs. Non-Adj

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #1  
LT1 POWR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,830
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Adj vs. Non-Adj

Im going to be modding my suspension soon and i just want to know some basics. Is it worth the extra $ to get adustable parts as opposed to non-adjustable. Whats the best bang for buck brand out there. And what all should i get. Its going to be pretty much a street car that see's the track 1-2 times a years. Im not really looking for a drag setup but i just want a better suspension. Also i would like to lower it about 2 inches. Any help would be appreciated.
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #2  
Greed4Speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,507
From: FTW, TX
Re: Adj vs. Non-Adj

For the most part, not worth it. If you don't know what you're doing, stay non-adjustable. The only adjustable parts you'll want is a PHB (have to adjust if you lower) and TA. Coil overs wouldn't be bad either. 2" drop on a street car is kamakazi. Especially if NE roads are like other mid-west roads.
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #3  
sssalah's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,152
From: Bahrain
Re: Adj vs. Non-Adj

And them headers wont live long with that much lowering.
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #4  
OBE1 95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 4,950
From: San Diego, CA
Re: Adj vs. Non-Adj

Lowering the car can cause the body to shift relative to the axle (left to right), thus causing your tires to potential hit the body driving over bumps. An adjustable panhard rod will allow you to correct for this shift.

IMO, lowering a car 2" will comprimise handling; a 1" drop would be fine You should upgrade your shocks when you have the springs done, and upgrade sway bars. A lot of us like the 35mm hollow front, 21mm rear sway bars.

Give Sam Strano a call (stranoparts.com). He's a F-Body suspension expert and can help you choose components for your driving style.
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 06:26 PM
  #5  
Severous01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,367
From: Burlington, NJ
Re: Adj vs. Non-Adj

lowering the car more than about 1" will compromise the geometry of the suspension. even with a 1" drop you have to change the alignment specs on the front end. if you go more than that, the stock upper and lower a-arms won't hang with the tolerance change. you wont even be able to set enough camber to get into the 0 area. stock setup is 3* camber. if you go 1" lower, it's 4* camber, and if you go with a 1.75" drop, it's 5* camber. the ball joints on the upper a-arm will not be able to maintain that 5* and will snap when you need it the most.
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 07:17 AM
  #6  
NOSCaMaRo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
Re: Adj vs. Non-Adj

If lowering you will want to spend the extra for the adjust PHB.

Control arms arent necessary needed to be adjustable. If you do go adjustable use a set with sepherical rod ends, they help to eliminate rear end bind. If you are lowering I assume you want to handle and these are the way to go
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jul 3, 2015 02:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
87Aerocoupe
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
0
Jan 10, 2015 07:27 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.