Crane HP Hydraulic Roller-Lifters
Crane HP Hydraulic Roller-Lifters
I’m running the Crane “high-performance” Hydraulic Roller-Lifters with my Comp XFI-292 cam (lift in the .590s at the valve) in my LTX 396 stroker.
The Crane Tech department is telling me to use 1, to 1 ½ turns preload with their high-performance HR lifters. Specifically, their high-performance lifters require that additional preload (different from other HR lifters on the market). And that additional preload will give me the maximum performance and RPM from their HR lifters.
That is a lot of preload, considering the general assumption for performance HR applications is ¼ to one ½ turn preload, or less. However, I’m been having some high RPM issues with my engine (also just installed new PAC-1518s).
So, does everyone agree the Crane’s recommendation for 1 to 1 ½ turns of preload with these HR lifters?
WD
The Crane Tech department is telling me to use 1, to 1 ½ turns preload with their high-performance HR lifters. Specifically, their high-performance lifters require that additional preload (different from other HR lifters on the market). And that additional preload will give me the maximum performance and RPM from their HR lifters.
That is a lot of preload, considering the general assumption for performance HR applications is ¼ to one ½ turn preload, or less. However, I’m been having some high RPM issues with my engine (also just installed new PAC-1518s).
So, does everyone agree the Crane’s recommendation for 1 to 1 ½ turns of preload with these HR lifters?
WD
Last edited by The Engineer; Jan 7, 2008 at 08:42 AM.
Here is the specific information on the Crane lifters.
Long travel design for 87-99 blocks originally equipped with hydraulic roller cam and lifters.
A necessity when camshafts have greater than stock lobe lift or reduced base circle diameter.
For use with standard GM alignment bars. 10535-16a
Again, I want to get some opinions here on the forum before I add a full-turn of preload.
WD
Long travel design for 87-99 blocks originally equipped with hydraulic roller cam and lifters.
A necessity when camshafts have greater than stock lobe lift or reduced base circle diameter.
For use with standard GM alignment bars. 10535-16a
Again, I want to get some opinions here on the forum before I add a full-turn of preload.

WD
I know crane said they gained power by adding more preload to their lifters. On a side not I'm not sure how you expected the 1518's to fix your valvefloat problem since they have the same spring pressure and rate as your old 918's.
Also, while the 918s and the PAC-1518s have the same basic specs, the 1518s are supposed to be a much better spring (general consensus from many articles). Also, a lot of the LS guys are using the 1518s. Additionally, PAC tells me they originally made the 918s for Comp and their 1218s are the same as the 918s.
WD
Last edited by The Engineer; Jan 7, 2008 at 08:24 PM.
Thanks, that is the only Crane specific lifter info I’ve heard so far (from anyone).
Also, while the 918s and the PAC-1518s have the same basic specs, the 1518s are supposed to be a much better spring (general consensus from many articles). Also, a lot of the LS guys are using the 1518s. Additionally, PAC tells me they originally made the 918s for Comp and their 1218s are the same as the 918s.
WD
Also, while the 918s and the PAC-1518s have the same basic specs, the 1518s are supposed to be a much better spring (general consensus from many articles). Also, a lot of the LS guys are using the 1518s. Additionally, PAC tells me they originally made the 918s for Comp and their 1218s are the same as the 918s.
WD
As far as the preload it can't hurt to try it.
On the lifter preload issue. I'm going with Crane's recommendation and placing the preload at "one full turn" to see if that improves the high RPM issue. I only need a slight improvement in the 6500+ RPM range (3rd gear as I approach the stripe).
Additionally, I never did get a conclusive post here (one way or the other)on Crane's recommendation for "one to one and a half turns" of preload. Possbily that additional lifter preload will also help the high RPM issue.
WD
The only way I see that much preload helping is if their lifter has a softer "push". As for the spring and the valve float there is so much more to it then just seat pressure. The pac's have a much higher rebound rate and allow a wider range of harmonics with out reducing the stability.
The only way I see that much preload helping is if their lifter has a softer "push". As for the spring and the valve float there is so much more to it then just seat pressure. The pac's have a much higher rebound rate and allow a wider range of harmonics with out reducing the stability.
WD
The thing about 1 turn is if ya float the valves it will pump up and hold the valve open that much further.Possibly getting into a piston.
There will be no performance difference in 1/8 and 1 turn.
Too much spring is way better than not enough.
There will be no performance difference in 1/8 and 1 turn.
Too much spring is way better than not enough.


