LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

cc306 = 1.6 what lift?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:29 AM
  #1  
kline454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 420
cc306 = 1.6 what lift?

the reason im asking is i just bought a set of lt4 roller rockers, and there good up to .575 lift, and i think that would be my lift, i think ill be fine because it says there good as long as you dont exceed .575 lift.
anyone else running this setup?
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #2  
Ray@NitroDaves's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 997
.544/.576 w/1.6 rockers

to calculate take the stated lift...divide by 1.5 then multiply by 1.6
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #3  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Lift with 1.5 rockers, divide by 1.5, multiply by 1.6.

Example: .500 / 1.5 = .333 lobe lift, x 1.6 = .533
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #4  
kline454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 420
well put the rockers on everything seems good, anyone else useing lt4 rockers?
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 08:37 PM
  #5  
Ray@NitroDaves's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 997
Originally Posted by kline454
i think ill be fine because it says there good as long as you dont exceed .575 lift.
Originally Posted by kline454
well put the rockers on everything seems good, anyone else useing lt4 rockers?
you say don't exceed .575...the 306 is .576 w/1.6 rockers...I realize it is only .001...but I don't like being that close to the limits.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 11:35 PM
  #6  
Critter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,511
From: fort worth/burleson Tx
Originally Posted by Ray@NitroDaves
you say don't exceed .575...the 306 is .576 w/1.6 rockers...I realize it is only .001...but I don't like being that close to the limits.
agreed
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 06:59 AM
  #7  
kline454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 420
yeah the summit tech line says it will be fine as long as the clearance is good, there should be at least .020 between the base of the nut and the body of the rocker at max lift and i have .030,
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 07:09 AM
  #8  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
Originally Posted by kline454
yeah the summit tech line says it will be fine as long as the clearance is good, there should be at least .020 between the base of the nut and the body of the rocker at max lift and i have .030,
Would just like to mention that over the years I have read where some guys shy away from those rockers, once their in the size cam range that you are using. Could be internet BS, then again, maybe not. Take it for what it's worth.
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 07:14 AM
  #9  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
Would just like to mention that over the years I have read where some guys shy away from those rockers, once their in the size cam range that you are using. Could be internet BS, then again, maybe not. Take it for what it's worth.

I have Crane aluminum rockers on my race motor: ~0.700" lift and 7,500rpm with some fairly heavy valves and stiff srpings.

Rich
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #10  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Originally Posted by rskrause
I have Crane aluminum rockers on my race motor: ~0.700" lift and 7,500rpm with some fairly heavy valves and stiff srpings.

Rich
I bet those aren't self aligns, at hi lift the self aligns slide off the side
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 07:20 AM
  #11  
kline454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
Would just like to mention that over the years I have read where some guys shy away from those rockers, once their in the size cam range that you are using. Could be internet BS, then again, maybe not. Take it for what it's worth.


yeah i wouldnt go any bigger than what i have with them but im not going to be changeing my setup, and the clearance is there so i dont see the problem,
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 07:29 AM
  #12  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally Posted by mdacton
I bet those aren't self aligns, at hi lift the self aligns slide off the side

Right, I didn't realize he was referring to SA, just the Crane rockers in general.

Rich
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 07:30 AM
  #13  
kline454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 420
yeah i have spun the motor to 7k with no problems with my old proform rockers,
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 07:31 AM
  #14  
kline454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 420
they where SA,
Old Feb 27, 2007 | 07:34 AM
  #15  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
I don't think you quite understand, do you see how the rocker aligns? at the higher lift do you see how it has less side to side support? Take alook at everything and try to understand it....

I'm not trying to tell you anything bad but I have had one fly off at 6k plus and I was lucky

this is all I had




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.