LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Synthetic oil equivalent of 15W40?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 08:09 PM
  #1  
BottleFedZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 68
From: Calgary, Alberta
Synthetic oil equivalent of 15W40?

My engine builder recommended I run 10W40 or 15W40 dino oil in my car.

I wanted to run synthetic.

What would be the synthetic equivalent of Quaker State 10W40 dino oil? 15W50 Mobil 1 Synthetic?
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #2  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
From what I've seen, the next thinner grade synthetic will provide oil film strengths that are greater than the dino oil being replaced. Meaning, a 5W30 synthetic is preferable to a 10w40 dino. Plus you'll gain a tiny amount of power due to less friction with the lighter synthetic.
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 08:38 PM
  #3  
1loudz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 233
From: Los Angeles, CA
i just started running 15W/40 Royal Purple. So far so good! Id recommend it.
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #4  
BottleFedZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 68
From: Calgary, Alberta
I'm not sure if I would go thinner.

I was wondering if 15W50 was too thick.

Mobil1 claims its for high performance motors.
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 09:38 PM
  #5  
94formulabz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,591
From: PA
10w40 = 10w40
dino=synthetic

The oils meet the same viscosity standards to get their respective ratings. Synthetics may provide slightly better lubrication and resistance to breakdown, but their viscosity must be in the same standard ranges as conventional oil to receive the same cold and warm viscosity ratings.

Ask your builder if he was recommending a dino oil for break in. That is a controversial topic though.

-brent
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #6  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
Originally posted by 94formulabz
10w40 = 10w40
dino=synthetic

The oils meet the same viscosity standards to get their respective ratings. Synthetics may provide slightly better lubrication and resistance to breakdown, but their viscosity must be in the same standard ranges as conventional oil to receive the same cold and warm viscosity ratings.
Your missing the point. The viscosity may be identical, but the oil film strength on the bearings will be stronger with the synthetic, which is why you can run the next viscosity grade down.
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 12:14 PM
  #7  
94formulabz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,591
From: PA
You *could* run a lighter synthetic if you were made of money and looking for a couple HP on a race motor. I'm not sure that is what Bottlefed is looking for though. For longevity i'd still recommend sticking with the builders recommended viscousity.

Viscosity is a physical property that relates to the oils abillity to hydrodynamically lubricate the bearings given the oil pressure, pump capacity, and tolerances. Hydrodynamic lubrication is what we want for minimizing wear.

I'm not aware of any direct measures of film strength other than measures of wear which imply better film strength. I could be wrong and there is some way to directly measure film strength. I said that synthetic provides "slightly better lubrication". What I meant by that is that the superior chemical composition has better film strength and lubrication.

This only comes into play when the lubricant is acting like a boundry lubricant. Both the base oil (synthetic vs dino) and the antiwear addatives which could be added to each base stock come into play here.

If you choose to run a lighter weight synthetic you are sacrificeing some of the oil's ability to hydrodynamically lubricate and relying on boundry lubrication. Why not have the best of both worlds and run a synthetic of a viscosity matched to the bearing tolerances and pump capacity/pressure?

I'm not an oil Phd though so i'm open to discussion/response

-brent
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 01:00 PM
  #8  
ImpySS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 58
From: Chicago, IL
I like Mobil 1 0W-40, but it's COLD here in Chicago.
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 01:22 PM
  #9  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally posted by 94formulabz


If you choose to run a lighter weight synthetic you are sacrificeing some of the oil's ability to hydrodynamically lubricate and relying on boundry lubrication. Why not have the best of both worlds and run a synthetic of a viscosity matched to the bearing tolerances and pump capacity/pressure?

I'm not an oil Phd though so i'm open to discussion/response

-brent
So the question is, do you run the same weight as dino oil or do you run a higher one?
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #10  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
Well, I'll leave it at this. My motor makes over 650 fwhp and has done it for two years of street/track use with Mobil 1 5W30. Prior to that, the stock short block belted out 500 fwhp, and at 70,000 miles, the cylinder cross hatching was still mint, and the bearings looked awesome. That was also with Mobil 1 5W30. So I'm gonna stick with the hot hand!
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 03:03 PM
  #11  
BottleFedZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 68
From: Calgary, Alberta
Ok but what about for guys that have more clearance and need to run a thicker oil?

I've always been told that synthetic was thinner so I should go a little thicker than my reg oil?
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 03:31 PM
  #12  
Tony Danza's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 260
From: Turnersville/Washington Twp. NJ
you said your engine builder recomended this oil......do you think its possible that he recomended this oil for the engine break in and may not have been totaly clear about its future use?
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #13  
BottleFedZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 68
From: Calgary, Alberta
Pretty sure.

he said the bearing clearances were greater.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
realistyc
Cars For Sale
4
Jul 28, 2015 07:32 PM
big_mac421
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
Jul 13, 2015 03:48 PM
jl1ne
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Jul 7, 2015 08:38 PM
streetbad
Advanced Tech
0
Jul 5, 2015 10:40 PM
SergheiS
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Jul 5, 2015 03:27 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.