Pacific Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington

Opinions please...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 04:58 PM
  #1  
sleeperZragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,419
From: Coquitlam, British Columbia
Opinions please...

http://www.spohn.net/index.cfm?fusea...&productid=118


....pros and cons?
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 05:02 PM
  #2  
silicuda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 543
From: West Vancouver / Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Wouldn't these create rattle or some kind of noise?
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 05:32 PM
  #3  
97TA-WS6-Con's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,751
From: Surrey, BC, Can
I decided NOT to go to poly bushings as I heard they are not street friendly. I gather thet DO transfer to much vibration for the comfort of a daily driver.

'Course, the mounts themselves would take some weight off.

Of course the cheapest way for me to loose some weight on the car is to go on a diet myself
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 05:32 PM
  #4  
CoryM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 806
From: White Rock,BC,Canada
Pros: No movement in engine when launching giving you quicker response. Cons: if its a steet car it will shake itself apart. There is nothing there to suck up the engine vibration and it will be transfered to the rest of the car (especially on a unibody). You will not be able to see out your rearview mirrors because they will shake. IMO track only, and I have a pretty lax definition of streetable. Unless you are into MAJOR hp polys will be a better solution. They dont flex much but do suck up some of the vibration. If you want solid mounts for the track but not the street use a cable or chain cinch that you leave loose for the street. Then when you want to race you just pull the lever tight and the engine will not move. Uncle used to do that when he raced for $$$.
CoryM
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 05:37 PM
  #5  
CoryM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 806
From: White Rock,BC,Canada
Doing a bit of reading and it appears the technical name for the cable cinch is a "torque strap" .
CoryM
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 05:37 PM
  #6  
Rybar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 319
From: Burnaby, B.C. Canada
Exclamation

I heard that solid motor mounts for our cars causes the knock sensor to detect more knock, and thus retards the timing. I would vote against them, doesn't seem like they are worth it.
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #7  
sleeperZragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,419
From: Coquitlam, British Columbia
Originally posted by Rybar
I heard that solid motor mounts for our cars causes the knock sensor to detect more knock, and thus retards the timing. I would vote against them, doesn't seem like they are worth it.
Very good point Ryan...thanks guys
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ks0209
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
Oct 1, 2015 07:32 AM
drt
LS1 Based Engine Tech
6
Sep 27, 2015 04:39 PM
SEOJustin
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
5
Sep 24, 2015 04:39 PM
jackpawt883
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Jul 31, 2015 08:15 AM
birdblack
Drivetrain
2
Jul 8, 2015 07:23 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 PM.