View Poll Results: 2004 GTO pics poll
Sucks
2
13.33%
OK but wouldn't buy one
4
26.67%
Lack of options would make me buy one
5
33.33%
Makes you sport a chubba
4
26.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll
2004 GTO pics
#1
2004 GTO pics
http://gm.wieck.com/forms/gm/*query?gto&source=all
What do you guys think ?
They shoud have done something with the hood as the nose looks like most Pontiacs currently in production.
Otherwise it should be a decent ride.
Marc
What do you guys think ?
They shoud have done something with the hood as the nose looks like most Pontiacs currently in production.
Otherwise it should be a decent ride.
Marc
#3
Blah, looks like a regular family car. They should have just kept the Camaro's and Firebird's.
Whats the point of designing a whole new car that has the same EXACT drivetrain???
I personally don't think it will sell any better than the F-bodys... Just my opinion
Whats the point of designing a whole new car that has the same EXACT drivetrain???
I personally don't think it will sell any better than the F-bodys... Just my opinion
#4
Originally posted by TunedPort 335
Whats the point of designing a whole new car that has the same EXACT drivetrain???
Whats the point of designing a whole new car that has the same EXACT drivetrain???
Although it looks like a riced out 2 door Civic with that spoiler,I wouldn't call it ugly, just rather boring in appearence,not really what I think of when I think GTO either (no ram air hood or 400+ cubic inch engine?????Sounds like a 74 GTO ). I probably wouldn't buy it,but it isn't quite as bad as a Aztek or 2003 Silverado's nose
Last edited by Richard Cabeza; 01-04-2003 at 02:19 PM.
#5
my buddy and I were talking about this last night when we were watching xXx, they have a featurette about the new GTO on the dvd
I think it looks very similar to the grand am, but of course thats just the exterior..... could be a sleeper for people that don't know about them. Some ricer kid might just think of it as a "hooked up" grand am and then the thing will put a beating on them
Holden has some really nasty cars in their lineup and GM definately needs to start looking over there to see what they should be doing over here, half of their cars come with the LS1 and t-56
definately go check out Holden't website to see what I'm talking about
I think it looks very similar to the grand am, but of course thats just the exterior..... could be a sleeper for people that don't know about them. Some ricer kid might just think of it as a "hooked up" grand am and then the thing will put a beating on them
Holden has some really nasty cars in their lineup and GM definately needs to start looking over there to see what they should be doing over here, half of their cars come with the LS1 and t-56
definately go check out Holden't website to see what I'm talking about
#7
340hp with the Z06's gearing... its not really a heavy car either. People should post the same numbers with those things as with the ls1 camaros. If the price isnt out of control on the thing, I'd seriously consider one.
#8
If I wanted to fast in a straight line for short money, I would buy a used F-body.
If I want a nice new car with a trunk, actual rear seats, and a car that handles and can handle the potholes well, a GTO would suite me just fine.
The drivetrain is NOT exactly the same as a GTO.
This LS1 will have more power, the tranny has ZO6 tranny guts and the rear end is stronger ring and pinon not to mention it is Independant Rear Suspension.
The car will do very well. What other american car has all that? What car best resembles it? M3 comes to mind.
If I want a nice new car with a trunk, actual rear seats, and a car that handles and can handle the potholes well, a GTO would suite me just fine.
The drivetrain is NOT exactly the same as a GTO.
This LS1 will have more power, the tranny has ZO6 tranny guts and the rear end is stronger ring and pinon not to mention it is Independant Rear Suspension.
The car will do very well. What other american car has all that? What car best resembles it? M3 comes to mind.
#9
You have got to be kidding. When I looked at those pics I thought I was looking at a honda with ground effects from the side. But you can't complain about 340hp ls1 6spd, no matter what shell houses it. I'm going to have to wait until I actually see one in person to finalize my opinion, because they always somewhat change from the debut showcases.
#13
Originally posted by 9SECONDLX
SPEAking of neons have you seen the turbo charged one they are coming out with 0-60 in 5.7 seconds for 20k..
also some one told me that camaro is coming back in 2005?
SPEAking of neons have you seen the turbo charged one they are coming out with 0-60 in 5.7 seconds for 20k..
also some one told me that camaro is coming back in 2005?
#14
Originally posted by TunedPort 335
Blah, looks like a regular family car. They should have just kept the Camaro's and Firebird's.
Whats the point of designing a whole new car that has the same EXACT drivetrain???
I personally don't think it will sell any better than the F-bodys... Just my opinion
Blah, looks like a regular family car. They should have just kept the Camaro's and Firebird's.
Whats the point of designing a whole new car that has the same EXACT drivetrain???
I personally don't think it will sell any better than the F-bodys... Just my opinion