Middle Atlantic New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania

If you've been to quaker city, step inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 10:58 AM
  #1  
3rw1n's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 30
From: Ohio
If you've been to quaker city, step inside

i'm just wondering, for those of you who have been to QCR, what your times are compared to other tracks? Is QCR really as slow as everyone tells me?
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 11:54 AM
  #2  
Tom Richdale's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27
From: NJ
I was there for the NMCA race last year. The track is slow. If you stand on the starting line you'll notice that the track is UPHILL!
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 11:59 AM
  #3  
3rw1n's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 30
From: Ohio
Yeah, it's a mini mount everest. I'm just trying to figure out how much slower it is than any other track. How did your car run?
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 03:10 PM
  #4  
Grease's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
both these runs were made the same week, same weather conditions and near identical 60ft times

QCR - 12.904 @ 106.64mph - 1.88 60ft
D42 - 12.616 @ 110.33mph - 1.86 60ft

If you want know what your car would have run on a flat track look at your 1/8 mile times and use the formula to calculate 1/4 mile times. QCR doesn't start to go uphill until after ther 1/8 mile.

Last edited by Grease; Apr 21, 2003 at 03:14 PM.
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 04:42 PM
  #5  
3rw1n's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 30
From: Ohio
Is it 1/8 e.t. * 1.55 ?
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 06:33 PM
  #6  
Grease's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
Multiplying 1.55 for ET and 1.29 for mph is pretty close for our cars.

My 12.90 @ 106 run would have been 12.75 @ 109mph which is what I would usually ran at D42 last year.

Keep in mind that that formula only works if you have good traction. My current best is 12.531 @ 115.44mph spinning my tires upto the 330' mark. If you go by my 1/8 mile time on that run I should have only run 12.728 @ 115.22mph

Last edited by Grease; Apr 21, 2003 at 06:40 PM.
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 07:05 PM
  #7  
3rw1n's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 30
From: Ohio
Originally posted by Grease
Multiplying 1.55 for ET and 1.29 for mph is pretty close for our cars.

My 12.90 @ 106 run would have been 12.75 @ 109mph which is what I would usually ran at D42 last year.

Keep in mind that that formula only works if you have good traction. My current best is 12.531 @ 115.44mph spinning my tires upto the 330' mark. If you go by my 1/8 mile time on that run I should have only run 12.728 @ 115.22mph
Hey buddy, the e.t. is kinda sketchy b/c of lack of traction, but if your mph formula is no typo. I'm looking at a 108mph trapspeed at a flat track.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WobblySausage
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Oct 7, 2015 02:44 PM
autoxr166
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Sep 25, 2015 04:21 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 18, 2015 03:46 PM
Bxlt1
Drivetrain
8
Sep 17, 2015 08:31 AM
RubyRedIrocZ
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
2
Sep 10, 2015 01:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.