LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Who has a a stroker with 6" rods with a lot of miles

Old Feb 27, 2003 | 01:01 PM
  #1  
merim123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 309
From: Chicago Area
Who has a a stroker with 6" rods with a lot of miles

I'm pulling my hair out deciding which way to go with my car.

My current plan is a 383 NA with about 420rwhp max to keep it drivable. My overall project goal is Viper type performance.

I've heard the arguments on longer rods but everyone seems to think the 6" rod engines will not live as long.

I currently put 4-6k miles a year on the camaro.

Who out there has run 6" rods for a long period of time ? Say more than 30k miles?
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 01:05 PM
  #2  
hsyr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,025
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
I don't have any experiance with strokers of my own but I don't see why 6" rods would cause an engine to not last as long. I thought using them put less stress on the pistions, therefore making it last longer? I dunno, maybe someone who knows will chime in. I would like to know who has the most miles on their 383, 396, or whatever.
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #3  
12sec97Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 422
From: Katy, TX
I'm also interested in this. I've never heard anything about it, and i'm trying to decide whether to go 355 or 383 with a BIG blower when i rebuild. I'm probably gonna rev to the fuel cutoff @7000 rpms.
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 02:03 PM
  #4  
94droptopz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 565
From: mt. holly, nc , usa
im curious as to why you think 6"rods wont last as long?
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #5  
iwon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 77
the angle is what causes reliability, because a 6in rod is longer it puts more load on the cyclinder walls then say a 5in, someone will go into more depth or contact injunner
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 02:18 PM
  #6  
merim123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 309
From: Chicago Area
Originally posted by 94droptopz
im curious as to why you think 6"rods wont last as long?

Based on some other postings in advanced tech on rod discussions.

I don't have any experience with this. I'm just trying to understand so I can make an informed decision.
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 02:26 PM
  #7  
94droptopz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 565
From: mt. holly, nc , usa
well ive never ran a stroker motor but i did have a 73 camaro with 6" rods i drove for 2 years. believe me i put a ton of miles on that car. hard miles!! never a problem with the rods. i got the rings a few times with the 175 shot but that about it. i would guess i put about 40k on it in a little over 2 years. hope this helps
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 05:38 PM
  #8  
merim123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 309
From: Chicago Area
For those interested, here's a link my Mopar buddy sent me. Still doesn't help my crisis, but I hope it helps others.



http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/rod-tech-c.htm
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
1
May 25, 2016 08:10 PM
RUENUF
South Atlantic
4
Mar 13, 2016 03:39 PM
D1SC383LT4
Parts For Sale
1
Jan 26, 2015 01:41 PM
Hurin
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
4
Dec 13, 2014 07:38 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM.