What would cause my car to never go above 6375 rpm?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 378
From: Extended Stay America or Value Place, USA
What would cause my car to never go above 6375 rpm?
I am working on fixing a high rpm miss, but i found something very interesting when I was logging some WOT passes. Keep in mind my rev limiter is set at 6950 rpm. Every time i accelerate from a stop, it pulls right up to exactly 6375 rpm, then starts missing like its hitting the rev limiter. 6375 is flat out as high as it will go. Whats up with that? I can't figure it out....If the rev limiter is set at 6950, it should pull right up to the rev limiter just fine. It doesn't seem like an ignition issue to me, b/c its just weird that it stops pulling at 6375 EVERY time. Sounds like something in the programming is preventing me from going over 6375. My log goes like this:
RPM:
6000
6055
6185
6245
6300
6375
6375
6250
6200 <---still WOT, even though revs are falling...
Every time it just stops pulling at 6375 exactly. Anyone have any ideas?
RPM:
6000
6055
6185
6245
6300
6375
6375
6250
6200 <---still WOT, even though revs are falling...
Every time it just stops pulling at 6375 exactly. Anyone have any ideas?
Last edited by allmotorta; Jun 9, 2003 at 01:50 PM.
The stock PCM uses an 8-bit data field for RPM. Each "number" represents 25rpm, so the max RPM that will fit in the data field is 255 X 25 = 6,375. It will support RPM higher than that, it just can't indicate it on a scanner.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 378
From: Extended Stay America or Value Place, USA
Originally posted by Injuneer
The stock PCM uses an 8-bit data field for RPM. Each "number" represents 25rpm, so the max RPM that will fit in the data field is 255 X 25 = 6,375. It will support RPM higher than that, it just can't indicate it on a scanner.
The stock PCM uses an 8-bit data field for RPM. Each "number" represents 25rpm, so the max RPM that will fit in the data field is 255 X 25 = 6,375. It will support RPM higher than that, it just can't indicate it on a scanner.
The new version of TTS DataMaster is supposto poll a different field in the pcm (a 16 bit value) so can read higher values (it's on their site as a beta product).
Sounds like you are having some other issue - it is probably higher than 6375 - that value in just an artifact of the pcm scaling method, as outlined above.
Chris
Sounds like you are having some other issue - it is probably higher than 6375 - that value in just an artifact of the pcm scaling method, as outlined above.
Chris
Originally posted by 4drLT4
How did you adjust the lash on those Comp R's? Anything more than an 1/8 turn is too much. If you went near 1/2 turn...you just found your problem.
How did you adjust the lash on those Comp R's? Anything more than an 1/8 turn is too much. If you went near 1/2 turn...you just found your problem.
Thanks.
Originally posted by GREGG 97Z
Would that lash adjustment apply for Hotcam kit roller rockers as well? I'm having a miss starting around 5500 that I am trying to figure out as well, I think I may have them adjusted too tight. I thought I was supposed to go 1/4 - 1/2 turn past zero lash?
Thanks.
Would that lash adjustment apply for Hotcam kit roller rockers as well? I'm having a miss starting around 5500 that I am trying to figure out as well, I think I may have them adjusted too tight. I thought I was supposed to go 1/4 - 1/2 turn past zero lash?
Thanks.
I have mine a tad bit less than an 1/8th turn. Now revs freely...
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 378
From: Extended Stay America or Value Place, USA
Originally posted by 4drLT4
The Comp R's come with a bit of pre-load. All they need is between a 1/16th - 1/8th of preload. I know from experience that if they're too tight, you'll rev to a point, and then it will feel like you've hit a wall.
I have mine a tad bit less than an 1/8th turn. Now revs freely...
The Comp R's come with a bit of pre-load. All they need is between a 1/16th - 1/8th of preload. I know from experience that if they're too tight, you'll rev to a point, and then it will feel like you've hit a wall.
I have mine a tad bit less than an 1/8th turn. Now revs freely...
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 378
From: Extended Stay America or Value Place, USA
Originally posted by 4drLT4
The Comp R's come with a bit of pre-load. All they need is between a 1/16th - 1/8th of preload. I know from experience that if they're too tight, you'll rev to a point, and then it will feel like you've hit a wall.
I have mine a tad bit less than an 1/8th turn. Now revs freely...
The Comp R's come with a bit of pre-load. All they need is between a 1/16th - 1/8th of preload. I know from experience that if they're too tight, you'll rev to a point, and then it will feel like you've hit a wall.
I have mine a tad bit less than an 1/8th turn. Now revs freely...
I gave it about 1/16-1/8 turn past 0 lash, and it now revs to 7000 no problem. I originally had it at 1/2 turn past 0 lash, which was obviously way too tight.
Originally posted by allmotorta
Thanks for the info bro, thats exactly what it was
I gave it about 1/16-1/8 turn past 0 lash, and it now revs to 7000 no problem. I originally had it at 1/2 turn past 0 lash, which was obviously way too tight.
Thanks for the info bro, thats exactly what it was
I gave it about 1/16-1/8 turn past 0 lash, and it now revs to 7000 no problem. I originally had it at 1/2 turn past 0 lash, which was obviously way too tight.
Thanks guys!
Combination Motorsports carries them.
http://www.cmotorsports.com
Great guys, great prices, great service. Flat out, GREAT!
http://www.cmotorsports.com
Great guys, great prices, great service. Flat out, GREAT!
Originally posted by allmotorta
Thanks for the info bro, thats exactly what it was
I gave it about 1/16-1/8 turn past 0 lash, and it now revs to 7000 no problem. I originally had it at 1/2 turn past 0 lash, which was obviously way too tight.
Thanks for the info bro, thats exactly what it was
I gave it about 1/16-1/8 turn past 0 lash, and it now revs to 7000 no problem. I originally had it at 1/2 turn past 0 lash, which was obviously way too tight.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sleeperZ96BT
LT1 Based Engine Tech
300
Jun 5, 2005 09:33 PM



