LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

TURN ON YOUR TV's WE LOST ANOTHER SPACE SHUTTLE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 08:31 AM
  #1  
GCEZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 90
From: Southeast Wisconsin
TURN ON YOUR TV's WE LOST ANOTHER SPACE SHUTTLE

GOD BLESS AMERICA AND ALL THOSE ABOARD!
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 08:46 AM
  #2  
Greasepunk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 346
From: Baytown, TX
There was an Israeli astronaut aboard it also, this is going to get even bigger.

My thoughts and prayers go out to the families of those onboard.

Old Feb 1, 2003 | 09:27 AM
  #3  
1fast95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 247
From: Wichita, KS
Space is still a largely unexplored and dangerous environment. Unfortunately, progress if often obtained only through the blood, sweat, tears, and sometimes, the lives of those willing to risk those dangers. It will also be unfortunate that there are those religous groups or countries that will try to capitalize on the fact that their was an Israeli astronaut on board.
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 02:33 PM
  #4  
jwar19's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 85
From: Cali
Yes, today is a sad day indeed. What really bothers me is that they were using a shuttle that was built in 1979. Their oldest shuttle that NASA has. You'd think they would know better to retire the shuttle after 10-15 years. But I don;t know. Thoughts and prayers to everyone out there. Peace.
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:28 PM
  #5  
frmula1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,201
From: Somewhere between a shotgun barrel, and a blood spatter on the wall.
heh, im sorry but this is just too weird... yes, there was an israeli aboard... and the bulk on the debris material fell in PALESTINE, Texas.... comon....
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:38 PM
  #6  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Didn't we just pass the anniversary of the Challenger disaster?
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:38 PM
  #7  
bob94z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14
From: Council Bluffs, IA Might as well be Omaha though!!!
Originally posted by jwar19
What really bothers me is that they were using a shuttle that was built in 1979. Their oldest shuttle that NASA has. You'd think they would know better to retire the shuttle after 10-15 years.
They've totally refurbished all of the sysytems on all of the shuttles within the last five years, so age of the craft porbally had no bearing on what happened. Plus Discovery and Atlantis actually had more flights under their belts.

Last edited by bob94z28; Feb 1, 2003 at 03:41 PM.
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:38 PM
  #8  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Didn't we just pass the anniversary of the Challenger disaster?
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:39 PM
  #9  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Didn't we just pass the anniversary of the Challenger disaster?
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:39 PM
  #10  
tryme96Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 234
Did the shuttle have an LT1? This is tech not the lounge.
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:43 PM
  #11  
1fast95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 247
From: Wichita, KS
Originally posted by bob94z28
They've totally refurbished all of the sysytems on all of the shuttles within the last five years, so age of the craft porbally had no bearing on what happened.

As a person who has worked as an aeronautical engineer all of his life, I totally disagree. The number of pressurization cycles an airframe has on it is very important. Metal can only expand and contract so many times before metal fatigue sets it. Case in point, the Alhoha airlines in Hawaii in which the roof peeled back. Cause, metal fatigue from excessive cycles and corrosion.
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:43 PM
  #12  
1fast95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 247
From: Wichita, KS
Originally posted by bob94z28
They've totally refurbished all of the sysytems on all of the shuttles within the last five years, so age of the craft porbally had no bearing on what happened.

As a person who has worked as an aeronautical engineer all of his life, I totally disagree. The number of pressurization cycles an airframe has on it is very important. Metal can only expand and contract so many times before metal fatigue sets it. Case in point, the Alhoha airlines in Hawaii in which the roof peeled back. Cause, metal fatigue from excessive cycles and corrosion.
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:44 PM
  #13  
1fast95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 247
From: Wichita, KS
Originally posted by bob94z28
They've totally refurbished all of the sysytems on all of the shuttles within the last five years, so age of the craft porbally had no bearing on what happened.

As a person who has worked as an aeronautical engineer all of his life, I totally disagree. The number of pressurization cycles an airframe has on it is very important. Metal can only expand and contract so many times before metal fatigue sets it. Case in point, the Alhoha airlines in Hawaii in which the roof peeled back. Cause, metal fatigue from excessive cycles and corrosion.
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:46 PM
  #14  
bob94z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14
From: Council Bluffs, IA Might as well be Omaha though!!!
Originally posted by 1fast95Z
As a person who has worked as an aeronautical engineer all of his life, I totally disagree. The number of pressurization cycles an airframe has on it is very important. Metal can only expand and contract so many times before metal fatigue sets it. Case in point, the Alhoha airlines in Hawaii in which the roof peeled back. Cause, metal fatigue from excessive cycles and corrosion.
Granted there will be some metal fatigue and etc. but i think NASA takes a little more care with their shuttles then Alhoa did with a lowly 737 doing island jumps
Old Feb 1, 2003 | 03:51 PM
  #15  
1fast95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 247
From: Wichita, KS
Originally posted by bob94z28
Granted there will be some metal fatigue and etc. but i think NASA takes a little more care with their shuttles then Alhoa did with a lowly 737 doing island jumps
You'd be very surprised. When I was doing my post graduate work, I was able to talk with some of the design and structural engineers at NASA and they were not impressed at all with the work that contractors did. I'm amazed that we haven't lost more shuttles than we have. Budgets and costs are always the bottom line in any maintenance program. NASA has to work within those constraints just like the airlines do.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.