LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Timing chain question for upgrade...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #16  
fastcamz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 795
From: Oak Ridge, TN USA
I have a Hot Cam in now w/ plans to go to a CC 306 after heads and block work, and still retain my unvented opti. Haven't heard/seen anything that would suggets this won't work. I do have a CSI water pump.
Thanks!
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #17  
Hawk350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 499
From: Grand Island, NY
Thanks!!!
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #18  
93TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 53
From: Tampa, FL
fastcam,

you're planning to use the stock timing set with the 306 cam?(that's most likely the cam i'm going with - but i was under the assumption the stock timing set would not handle the rpms)

thx
larry
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #19  
fastcamz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 795
From: Oak Ridge, TN USA
I will check w/ my engine builder (he's not in right now!) and post his response. I'll do a search as well to see if there's anything in the archives on this topic.
Thanks!
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #20  
jonaddis84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,639
From: Toledo, OH
Joe Overton uses a stock 94 timing set to go 9.7s @138mph...just some food for thought..he only puts 20-30 passes on it though and replaces every winter, but regardless..
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 04:38 PM
  #21  
fastcamz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 795
From: Oak Ridge, TN USA
That's what I was wanting to hear!
Thanks!
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #22  
ibanez6rg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,579
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally posted by fastcamz28
That's what I was wanting to hear!
Thanks!
You gotta understand though he probably tears into his motor a lot... is that something you wanna do? Take the time and money to do it once or take the time and money to do it over and over again. Just some more thought...
Old Mar 1, 2004 | 07:24 PM
  #23  
93TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 53
From: Tampa, FL
anyone know what is harder on the timing chain - the higher rpm you run w/ a 306 cam or the steeper lobe angles of a ex230/236 cam?

Last edited by 93TA; Mar 1, 2004 at 07:39 PM.
Old Mar 2, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #24  
Hawk350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 499
From: Grand Island, NY
Good question...I am sticking with the stock timing set because I dont plan on being at the track too often....and I dont plan on taking my car beyond 6000rpms anyways....so stock should do.
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 02:52 PM
  #25  
hot_red_z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 279
From: Kingston Springs, TN
so is the lunati set really worse off than a stock replacement one?
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #26  
GREGG 97Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,997
From: Reading, PA
Originally posted by jonaddis84
Joe Overton uses a stock 94 timing set to go 9.7s @138mph...just some food for thought..he only puts 20-30 passes on it though and replaces every winter, but regardless..
Most of us arent tearing into our engine every year though to switch cams and replace the timing set, at least I'm not.
I took my stocker out at 57K when I did the cam last year, up until then it had bolton's only since about 40k and was around 300rwhp. I was pretty surprised at how loose my original chain was, it had a lot of play in it, I could move it back and forth a good inch. I went with the Cloyes roller, I'm very glad that I upgraded it to something stronger.
Old Apr 21, 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #27  
Hawk350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 499
From: Grand Island, NY
Originally posted by GREGG 97Z
Most of us arent tearing into our engine every year though to switch cams and replace the timing set, at least I'm not.
I took my stocker out at 57K when I did the cam last year, up until then it had bolton's only since about 40k and was around 300rwhp. I was pretty surprised at how loose my original chain was, it had a lot of play in it, I could move it back and forth a good inch. I went with the Cloyes roller, I'm very glad that I upgraded it to something stronger.
From what I have been reading, the stock chains with stockj sprokets are made to be loose. I am going to purchase the cloyes oversized sproket to get rid of most of the play in the chain. I have spoked with my engine builder and he claims 400hp cars are fine with the stock chains. I am going to get a new chain and sprockets when installing the application.
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 06:22 AM
  #28  
SLeePer350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 292
From: Philly, PA
So lets clear something up....

I have a 94 formula. Therefore non vented opti. However when doing a cam swap, does the dowel need to be shorter for non vented? If a cam meant for a 95+ car is installed on a 92-94, then what can be done to make this work??? Simply cut the dowel down? is this safe? (I want to do this without swapping to a vented opti)

this thread is starting to get confusing...
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 07:50 PM
  #29  
Hawk350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 499
From: Grand Island, NY
I think the dowl is a bit longer on the 95+, the face of teh cam has a bigger opening to accomodate the vented opti as well. Not sure if this will work. I am getting a cam ground for the 94'....so it will look stock.
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 01:18 PM
  #30  
Hawk350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 499
From: Grand Island, NY
Ok, cam is picked out....230/236 with 112 lsa thanks fellas.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 AM.