LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

STS Turbo or Heads, Cam swap

Old Oct 25, 2003 | 10:52 PM
  #1  
FireHawk409's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 557
From: New Orleans,Louisiana
STS Turbo or Heads, Cam swap

Well Ive been slowly getting parts to get my car the way i want it, and for the past few weeks have been looking at diff heads and cam combo's. So far each company/person has its ups and downs, but all offer a good amount of power. Now though i have been thinking of getting a STS turbo setup. Its only 2995 and for a bit more u get a boost controller, exhuast tip. Basically 2995 should get me started. Then i would get my computer reprogrammed. So i figure 3300 is the most it will go. Now with the heads and cam it can range from 2500 to 3grand.

Now the heads and cam would be the cheaper but harder install. The turbo would be a bit more expensive but from what i have read the install isnt too complicated. Each mod seems to give me around the same hp rating. With everything running right i should get close to 400hp.

So what im getting at what does everyone here think i should go with. What would be the easiest to maintain and what would be more reliable for a 103kmotor. My motor is in pretty good condtion and runs great. So any suggestions welcomed.
Peace
Omar
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 08:56 AM
  #2  
magius231's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 956
From: Winston Salem, NC
I'm sort of in the same boat you are...I have a cam sitting in my storage waiting to be installed, but now I'm having turbo envy

IMO if your willing to put some time into tuning and monitoring knock, the turbo would be the way to go. I don't think a turbo is for your average install-then-never-think-about-it-again hot rodder though. At the same time, theres WAY more potential for big power with the turbo...hell throw some C16 in the tank, run the alky injection and start pushing 15psi...as long as your not detonating your fine even with stock pistons. If your not willing to keep an eye on knock though your gonna break a stock motor.

damn...anyone want to buy a brand new 230/236 cam?
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 09:01 AM
  #3  
reuter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 343
From: 757 VA
for a 103,000 mile motor, id stay away from the boost. heads/cam is reliable, a turbo setup is going to get you little support and youre going to have to get some good sized injectors and a heavy-duty fuel pump along with having to fit a turbo somewhere under the hood of a 4th gen. build it then boost it. in my opinion youre askin to pop your motor just slappin a kit on w/o heavy tuning.

just my $.02 though
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 09:16 AM
  #4  
magius231's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 956
From: Winston Salem, NC
Reuter, may want to check out the STS turbo kit some more, most of those problems are non issues with this kit. As far as boost being harder on a bottom end than heads/cam, thats actually incorrect. The stress put on by forced induction is considerably less than the stress put on by the RPM necessary to make a heads/cam setup perform even close to the FI setup. Thats why you see a lot of 200,000 mile Buick GN's still on the road running 12's or less
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 09:26 AM
  #5  
Red_94Formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 537
From: Watertown, Mass
an LT1 at 103k miles is nothing. mine at 94k miles does not even waste a drop of oil and still has all the cross hairs in the walls. i'd say get the turbo. then if you want more power do the cam and heads later on.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 09:51 AM
  #6  
LWillmann's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,831
From: Middle Tennessee
Is the STS turbo setup the one that mounts in the rear of the car?

If it is, you might want to consider PTK's kits. They run a little more than that STS setup, but they are a "standard" up front mounted turbo. A member of my car club is getting one (just waiting to receive it) for his car and is expecting 600-700 RWHP

I think they start around $3500 or so... It's another one to consider.

But either way you go, you're going to want a set of ported heads and a good cam for the turbo anyway. So, my advice would be to start with the head/cam combo, with a plan for a turbo setup later.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 10:33 AM
  #7  
drewstealth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,623
From: Fairfield, ca
I would do the heads/cam before i would turbo you car. The turbo would be a lot nicer, but Lwillman said you are gonna want some good ported heads before then. Besides if you get the turbo you aren't gonna be able to turn the boost up much on the stock bottom end. You know you will be tempted to do it also. The heads/cam will be alot safer with the stock bottom end. With the turbo you would have to keep it tuned really well not to hurt your engine. Also with the turbo you can get boost creep and with the stock bottom end not prepared to handle much boost it woudn't be good. Just do the heads/cam for now then later on. Build you block up for it so you can take full advantage of your turbo.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #8  
Tair's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 839
From: Honolulu, HI
I'm in the same boat you are FireHawk. I've been deciding if I wanna go forced induction (blower most likely) or heads/cam. After giving it a bunch of thought, I decided I'd go heads/cam first because if I were to lose a race with a turbo/blower people would say "What?! You run boost and still lost?!" as ignorant as they are. I'd rather go heads/cam, win a bunch of races and be able to say "No boost here"
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 11:44 AM
  #9  
1msfyter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,194
From: Austin texas
I just ordered the STS turbo also. Gonna do a few more things before the install.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 12:35 PM
  #10  
Ai's Avatar
Ai
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 786
From: Charlotte, NC
If you have the $ set aside to rebuild your shortblock, or at least replace it with another stocker, then forced induction is pretty fun .

If not & you still want to make power, only more reliably with the limitations of the stock hypereutectic stuff, then I'd stay NA. Nice thing about NA is that a decent topend can see more gains in a FI app than it did NA if you choose to swap shortblocks & turbo it down the road .
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 12:52 PM
  #11  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
Forced induction devices,e.g.,turbos, SCs are always a good way to go,in my opinion, because they can always be sold when you don't need them anymore.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 01:09 PM
  #12  
Rival's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 165
From: il
Ask the turbo guys in the FI section about the sts kit. They don't like the idea that you can just unbolt and take out the tubro. Also running the piping back and forth is kinda dumb. The car sts tested had forged pistions, ls1 rods and bearings studs etc. The bottom end was decent. Your 103k isn't ideal for boost. The gain from 5psi which is what you could run safe, isn't worth the whole tubro thing. Plus the 3300 you figured is short quite a bit. Heads/cam and a 150 shot is what I would do with 3300. You go way faster and your motor will live longer.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 02:44 PM
  #13  
got_hp?'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,456
From: sarasota, fl
without a doubt, heads/cam
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 02:47 PM
  #14  
joeSS97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,781
From: Detroit area
Heads and cam. I am not too keen on that turbo setup.
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 03:08 PM
  #15  
magius231's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 956
From: Winston Salem, NC
Originally posted by Rival
Ask the turbo guys in the FI section about the sts kit. They don't like the idea that you can just unbolt and take out the tubro. Also running the piping back and forth is kinda dumb. The car sts tested had forged pistions, ls1 rods and bearings studs etc. The bottom end was decent. Your 103k isn't ideal for boost. The gain from 5psi which is what you could run safe, isn't worth the whole tubro thing. Plus the 3300 you figured is short quite a bit. Heads/cam and a 150 shot is what I would do with 3300. You go way faster and your motor will live longer.
not originally it didn't..it does now because they wanted to start testing with higher boost. Who's to say this idea is any dumber than anything else thats been tried? When Rooster(?) wanted to put a roots style blower on his car he got all kinds of crap over it, now everyone sees it and wants to get it done too!

The PTK turbo kit is nice, but you have to relocate a lot of stuff, and its $3500 without the turbo which is another $850 or so. THe STS kit is $2995 with the turbo.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
chuyz28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
21
Feb 19, 2015 12:50 AM
chuyz28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Jan 15, 2015 04:14 PM
chuyz28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Nov 25, 2014 11:14 PM
F(ast)-body
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Feb 26, 2003 09:05 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM.