Research over opinion
Originally posted by magius231
umm, well since bang for the buck = gains for the buck when your talking motor work I don't understand your comment.
The 96-97 Y-pipe may be less restrictive but the header designs are poorer because of the limited amount of space to work with, and they still see the gains. I know your probably aware of this, but the 96-97 design and the 93-95 design are both dummy duals...they both go into a y-pipe and they both go into a crossflow muffler.
Don't take this personally but I think you need to do some more research on this as some of your information is not quite accurate, I.E. dual cat designs gaining more from headers than single cat, or not seeing much gain from headers period. I don't know very many people at all that can say they didn't instantly notice when they put headers on, and those that didn't had something wrong with their car.
umm, well since bang for the buck = gains for the buck when your talking motor work I don't understand your comment.
The 96-97 Y-pipe may be less restrictive but the header designs are poorer because of the limited amount of space to work with, and they still see the gains. I know your probably aware of this, but the 96-97 design and the 93-95 design are both dummy duals...they both go into a y-pipe and they both go into a crossflow muffler.
Don't take this personally but I think you need to do some more research on this as some of your information is not quite accurate, I.E. dual cat designs gaining more from headers than single cat, or not seeing much gain from headers period. I don't know very many people at all that can say they didn't instantly notice when they put headers on, and those that didn't had something wrong with their car.
Last edited by grygst76; Mar 31, 2003 at 03:55 PM.
Well, you say you beat your buddy in his WS6 off the line every time. Do you have the same engine mods, gearing, transmission/clutch/stall and how do your driving abilities compare? I'm not trying to give you a hard time but could it be that your driving ability is what is giving you the edge?
Then you go on to say that his car has the edge at high rpms and suffers at low reps because he has headers. Certainly a more radical cam will have the same effect, all other things being equal. Finally, you keep going back to headers being such an expensive mod, and I'll agree it's not cheap, but a cam change is generally accompanied by gaskets/springs/rockers/guideplates and maybe pushrods, and gears plus installation isn't so cheap either.
Then you go on to say that his car has the edge at high rpms and suffers at low reps because he has headers. Certainly a more radical cam will have the same effect, all other things being equal. Finally, you keep going back to headers being such an expensive mod, and I'll agree it's not cheap, but a cam change is generally accompanied by gaskets/springs/rockers/guideplates and maybe pushrods, and gears plus installation isn't so cheap either.
Well every car magazine will also tell you to start with the intake and exhaust and go from there.Now as for Losing low end torque,all my mods are in the signature and they were all done one at a time and i can tell you i have never lost any low end torque and i think that i have even gained some and as for drivability this thing drives and idles every bit as good as it did when it was stock.
Originally posted by Bud M
Well, you say you beat your buddy in his WS6 off the line every time. Do you have the same engine mods, gearing, transmission/clutch/stall and how do your driving abilities compare? I'm not trying to give you a hard time but could it be that your driving ability is what is giving you the edge?
Then you go on to say that his car has the edge at high rpms and suffers at low reps because he has headers. Certainly a more radical cam will have the same effect, all other things being equal. Finally, you keep going back to headers being such an expensive mod, and I'll agree it's not cheap, but a cam change is generally accompanied by gaskets/springs/rockers/guideplates and maybe pushrods, and gears plus installation isn't so cheap either.
Well, you say you beat your buddy in his WS6 off the line every time. Do you have the same engine mods, gearing, transmission/clutch/stall and how do your driving abilities compare? I'm not trying to give you a hard time but could it be that your driving ability is what is giving you the edge?
Then you go on to say that his car has the edge at high rpms and suffers at low reps because he has headers. Certainly a more radical cam will have the same effect, all other things being equal. Finally, you keep going back to headers being such an expensive mod, and I'll agree it's not cheap, but a cam change is generally accompanied by gaskets/springs/rockers/guideplates and maybe pushrods, and gears plus installation isn't so cheap either.
Last edited by grygst76; Apr 1, 2003 at 07:10 AM.
Originally posted by grygst76
A cam swap does not really mean all those factors springs/rockers/guideplates and maybe pushrods you can reuse stock parts if they are in good shape.
A cam swap does not really mean all those factors springs/rockers/guideplates and maybe pushrods you can reuse stock parts if they are in good shape.
Originally posted by grygst76
close to 1500 including install am I right?
close to 1500 including install am I right?
Understand that I'm not saying that there aren't other paths to increasing power on a stock motor, but that headers are a good starting point. Certainly I consider a (shorty) header install to be less intimidating than a cam install.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



