LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Re-installing intake manifold but now have a gap on the mating surface

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 07:40 PM
  #1  
BlackDog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 660
From: LakeLand, Florida
Re-installing intake manifold but now have a gap on the mating surface

Rebuilt my '94 motor to a 383. Had the heads squared off and the block prep as well. Now when I install the intake I have about 1/16 inch where you would apply the sealer. Installing the bolts does not close the gap.

Any ideas as to why????
Old Nov 29, 2003 | 08:07 PM
  #2  
PoorMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,534
From: Lousiana
Too much milled off the heads and/or block surface. No biggy. The book says that if more than 0.020 is removed then the intake side of the head should be milled sense the geometry is different. I have seen people here be ok w/ 0.030 removed but some have had leaks. BTW, they must of removed alot of material to have a gap that big. If you know how much they removed I can tell you how much they need to mill off the otherside. All the milling can be done on the intake to make it easier instead of the head. It doesn't matter.

The most important thing is to make sure you measure you pushrod length. You will almost definity need shorter pushrods.

Jeff D.

Last edited by PoorMan; Nov 29, 2003 at 08:14 PM.
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 07:29 AM
  #3  
BlackDog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 660
From: LakeLand, Florida
Originally posted by PoorMan
Too much milled off the heads and/or block surface. No biggy. The book says that if more than 0.020 is removed then the intake side of the head should be milled sense the geometry is different. I have seen people here be ok w/ 0.030 removed but some have had leaks. BTW, they must of removed alot of material to have a gap that big. If you know how much they removed I can tell you how much they need to mill off the otherside. All the milling can be done on the intake to make it easier instead of the head. It doesn't matter.

The most important thing is to make sure you measure you pushrod length. You will almost definity need shorter pushrods.

Jeff D.
That's what I was affaid of. Is it possible that using a thinner head gasket .029 vs .039 also be the issue as well. Should I use .039 instead?
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 09:26 AM
  #4  
BlackDog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 660
From: LakeLand, Florida
Ok, I managed to close the gap to .019mm. Does anyone know if the two surfaces should mate with no gap?

Last edited by BlackDog; Nov 30, 2003 at 03:20 PM.
Old Nov 30, 2003 | 01:38 PM
  #5  
PoorMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,534
From: Lousiana
I have never read of anyone having problems with 0.020 gap. The book just says that is when you should "start" to look at counter milling.

Jeff D.

Last edited by PoorMan; Nov 30, 2003 at 01:44 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mightymouse383
Parts For Sale
19
Jul 20, 2016 07:34 AM
69z-28
Parts For Sale
2
Jan 29, 2016 10:46 PM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jan 27, 2015 06:27 AM
Elcojoe
Parts For Sale
0
Nov 17, 2014 10:27 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.