Pro Action Heads
Re: Pro Action Heads
some welding and some drilling.. for the most part.. the coolant on a trad. sbc goes through the intake where as the ltx vent through the back of the heads.. so it need's to be rerouted.. and a few other things..
Re: Pro Action Heads
Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
Okay here's the $64,000 question: heads of this caliber I'm assuming flow in the 300+ range, but are they suitable to be used with the more "popular" LT1 cams? (Hotcam? LE2? Crane 227?) Or, assuming you bolted these onto a run-of-the-mill 355 LT1: would you need to run a 24X/25X duration cam and not expect torque to show up on a dyno graph anywhere under 3,000rpm to be able to make effective use out of a head like this?
There is a limit to port volume vs cubic inches, 240cc port on a 302..well that aint a good matchup. IMO
David
Re: Pro Action Heads
Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
There is a limit to port volume vs cubic inches, 240cc port on a 302..well that aint a good matchup. IMO
David
David
lol.. obviously they're is a bit of common sense that need's to be employed in such situation's.. but if your looking for a 10K rpm 302.. then you might be in the right place.. lol..
Re: Pro Action Heads
Originally Posted by FASTFATBOY
which in my mind would only be used in the quest of serious power..
Re: Pro Action Heads
Originally Posted by IllusionalTA
Eh Ford sux..
lol.. obviously they're is a bit of common sense that need's to be employed in such situation's.. but if your looking for a 10K rpm 302.. then you might be in the right place.. lol..
lol.. obviously they're is a bit of common sense that need's to be employed in such situation's.. but if your looking for a 10K rpm 302.. then you might be in the right place.. lol..A 240CC runner on one head may have the CSA the same as a 225CC runner in another head. It's the length guys.Just 'cause it is a 240CC runner don't mean jack when comparing different heads. Ya got to know the centerline length to see if they are close to the same length. If one is higher than the other then the port will be longer thus more CC's.
A big runner(CSA not CC's)on a small CID engine ya will have it set up to turn the snot out of it. If ya want it to do that then ya build accordingly with the parts to make it do that.
A 240CC runner is NO detriment to a 383 or 396 or 406 or 427CID.
Re: Pro Action Heads
Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
See that's my point: it's hard to determine where the limits for things like this lie because the general consensus seems to be that you should only use X part if you plan on making X amount of horsepower. In other words, is the reason you never see somebody running a head like a SB2.2 on a stock bottom end Hotcammed LT1 redlining at 6,500 because that head won't work for that RPM range with those cubes or simply because nobody's been crazy enough to drop that kinda cash to "only" make the kind've power that that combo would produce?
AGain why would you put a damn Hotcam in ANYTHING? There have been SB2 heads on a few 383 and 396 combos on this board that made SERIOUS power, there are varying levels of SB2 heads also, they could flow as little as 300 cfm or as much as 400 cfm..a little common sense plays a big role here.....conventional wisdom is being tested this day and age as far as port volume vs cubic inches vs cfm rules stand, and have stood for many years....but EFI and cam technology are breaking those old school rules.
BTW Chevy DID make a 302 less we forget
David
Re: Pro Action Heads
Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
See that's my point: it's hard to determine where the limits for things like this lie because the general consensus seems to be that you should only use X part if you plan on making X amount of horsepower. In other words, is the reason you never see somebody running a head like a SB2.2 on a stock bottom end Hotcammed LT1 redlining at 6,500 because that head won't work for that RPM range with those cubes or simply because nobody's been crazy enough to drop that kinda cash to "only" make the kind've power that that combo would produce?
SB2.2 can be made to flow in the 400/425+ CFM range and NASCAR gets out of the pits with them.
Mainly ya don't see them much is the cost factor and guys don't know what to do with 700/800+FWHP on the street.There are several that are making 800+FWHP with the SB2.2's but everything for the valve train is special and costs a plenty.
The average guy isn't that serious.
Wish I had a set,'cause I AM that serious.
Re: Pro Action Heads
Originally Posted by thesoundandthefury
See that's my point: it's hard to determine where the limits for things like this lie because the general consensus seems to be that you should only use X part if you plan on making X amount of horsepower. In other words, is the reason you never see somebody running a head like a SB2.2 on a stock bottom end Hotcammed LT1 redlining at 6,500 because that head won't work for that RPM range with those cubes or simply because nobody's been crazy enough to drop that kinda cash to "only" make the kind've power that that combo would produce?
Re: Pro Action Heads
Ok, so, uh, does anybody have any numbers with these heads? Let me know what you've got! I have some people trying to talk me into some Dart heads. If I can make bookus of power on some SB2 heads, then I will go into that.
Re: Pro Action Heads
Originally Posted by whitehooptie
Ok, so, uh, does anybody have any numbers with these heads? Let me know what you've got! I have some people trying to talk me into some Dart heads. If I can make bookus of power on some SB2 heads, then I will go into that.


