LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Preload on LS7 lifters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #1  
David94TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 489
From: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Preload on LS7 lifters

I'm replacing my lifters with the LS7 version. What do you guys like for preload on these?
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #2  
94zgreenmachine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,309
From: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
As loose as possible. I went a little past 1/8th to 1/4 turn past zero.
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #3  
David94TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 489
From: Chattanooga, Tennessee
OK, thanks.
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #4  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
I went 1/4 TPZL.
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #5  
MachinistOne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,001
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by 94zgreenmachine
As loose as possible. I went a little past 1/8th to 1/4 turn past zero.
Why?
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 08:38 AM
  #6  
95Blackhawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,277
From: Phoenix, AZ
I went 1/6th turn past zero lash.
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #7  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
This is the way that I understand it.
The theory of running lifter preload as loose as possible is to minimize any loss of lift in the event that the roller on the lifter breaks free from the cam lobe surface as a result of float or bounce.

Since the lifter piston has more travel in the lifter body with 1 TPZL compared to less travel with 1/4 TPZL, the loss of lift is greater with more preload since it would have to pump up more to regain control of the valve. This is why some say to run the least amount of lifter preload possible to resolve a minor valve float problem.

If the roller rides perfectly on the cam lobe and NEVER breaks free from the lobe surface, then it would not make a bit of difference if it were 1/4 TPZL or 1 TPZL.

I fear running any less than 1/4 TPZL because if you run zero lash or any negative number of preload, then the retainer clip in the lifter body will be taking a beating which could result in carnage.

Again this is the way I understand it. Maybe I am smoking crack.
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #8  
95Blackhawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,277
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by wrd1972
I fear running any less than 1/4 TPZL because if you run zero lash or any negative number of preload, then the retainer clip in the lifter body will be taking a beating which could result in carnage.
I heard that myself and went to a professional engine builder and asked about this. He thought I was crazy. He said in certain classes where they have to run hydraulic lifters, they will even run up to 0.006 lash in some cases.

Sounds extreme to me but he has built more motors than me.
Old Dec 3, 2008 | 02:52 PM
  #9  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
If this engine builder thinks it crazy, that hammering on the retainer clip by the lifter piston under race conditions wont result in carnage. I would consult a different engine builder.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
9t4lt4z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Oct 2, 2015 10:28 AM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
2
Aug 24, 2015 06:41 AM
mrwz28
Cars For Sale
0
Jul 8, 2015 09:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.