LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Pcmforless or Hypertech?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #1  
Chuckman93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16
Pcmforless or Hypertech?

I am at the point where I am going to get a performance chip for my 93' Z28, it has a SLP cai, and air foil, Magnaflow cat-back, a gutted catylitic, and a 160 degree thermostat. Which one of these will give me more horsepower, or is there a better one? Recomendations?
Old May 20, 2004 | 12:23 AM
  #2  
tfs95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 660
From: Cary, IL
i wouldnt do any tuning yet....u dont have any mods that require it. Not gonna see a whole lot of change with what you have done. But to choose one or the other, pcmforless is better, but once u do it, unless you have the capability to do updates yourself, that would be a waste. Personally i think the hypertech is not good at all.
Old May 20, 2004 | 12:25 AM
  #3  
ArizonaZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 200
From: Tucson, Arizona
I agree...The only reason I have a hypertech is because it came with the car. A real tune is much better, but don't waste your money on it yet. Get some more mods first.
Old May 20, 2004 | 12:25 AM
  #4  
simple's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,195
From: Springfield, IL
e-mail tuner@madz28.com and www.madz28.com

Ion is one hell of a nice guy and knows what he is doing plus he frequents this board and is willing to answer questions
Old May 20, 2004 | 12:26 AM
  #5  
eagleknight97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,495
From: Westmont, IL
Well, i woudl completely rule out the Hypertech, cuz that thing is only good for gear changes and fan activation temps. PCMFORLESS or MADZ28 tuning will help you out WAY more. Ion at MADZ28 says that his tune will give you aproximately 5-7hp on a bone stock car(i think thats what it was, could be wrong). Also, he can do more things for you than that hypertech could even begin to think about doing.
Old May 20, 2004 | 12:28 AM
  #6  
eagleknight97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,495
From: Westmont, IL
simple beat me to the punch, but very true
Old May 20, 2004 | 12:34 AM
  #7  
Chuckman93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16
I got an e-mail from pcmforless saying that with what I have done to my car I would see 20rwhp.
Old May 20, 2004 | 12:46 AM
  #8  
SWINGRRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 748
From: P-cola Fl
I thought Ion only did 94+, because of the chip. I know he is great with the 94+'s.
Goto www.speeddensity.org Its just for 93's, and Alvin has his own spot on there. You can talk directly to him, and see others experinces with him.
Old May 20, 2004 | 12:46 AM
  #9  
Johnnynsac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 589
From: Sacramento CA
If I were you, I'd rather save my money for some headers and some other mods. It's really up to you thow.
Old May 20, 2004 | 01:37 AM
  #10  
CMGETSM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 91
From: OKC, Oklahoma
PCMforless
Old May 20, 2004 | 01:39 AM
  #11  
speedmiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 823
From: houston, tx
I'd go with Alvin, simply because he will continue to update your chip at reasonable prices, as you get more mods + he's got a great rep with the 93s. BTW, Look at what ED Wright charges now to reflash your chip, and you'll choke on it...

Peronsally, I used a hypertech chip when I was realatively stock, with only a few bolt on's, and it performed great. I showed a 4 tenths ET drop with one of those dashboard dynos. Hey, I dont trust them much either, but I could definitely tell there was a power increase. I sure see a lot of people downing the hypertech chips, but most are 94-97 guys that have never used one...
Old May 20, 2004 | 01:53 AM
  #12  
screamin94Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 108
From: raleigh nc
theres a difference between a burned chip for a 93 and the power tuning for the 94-97s. IMO i'd just save my money and get headers, thats the best mod i've done on my car (which will change after i put the cam in ) i think you'll see better performance, not to mention sound from that.
Old May 20, 2004 | 01:53 AM
  #13  
Xride's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Originally posted by Chuckman93
I got an e-mail from pcmforless saying that with what I have done to my car I would see 20rwhp.
20 hp from the tune?

maybe 20 with the mods and the tune.


I got 7hp to the wheels with MADZ28 tuning. thats STOCK.
and thats with staying straped on the dyno and changing PCMs

Last edited by Xride; May 20, 2004 at 01:57 AM.
Old May 26, 2004 | 12:02 AM
  #14  
Alvin@pcmforless.com's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,614
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally posted by Xride
20 hp from the tune?

maybe 20 with the mods and the tune.


I got 7hp to the wheels with MADZ28 tuning. thats STOCK.
and thats with staying straped on the dyno and changing PCMs
I got 28rwhp out of a 93 vette with 30k miles and stock down to the original plugs..

But i guess your right, 28rwhp isn't much to be had on a otherwize completely stock car.

Old May 26, 2004 | 01:46 AM
  #15  
Xride's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,622
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Originally posted by ROOSTER93V8
I got 28rwhp out of a 93 vette with 30k miles and stock down to the original plugs..

But i guess your right, 28rwhp isn't much to be had on a otherwize completely stock car.

damn, I'll have to check again and look, but I was pretty sure my Fbody wasnt a vette.


I once saw a 130 hp and 240 ft lb gain from a tune...... on a deisel.
So I better expect that right.

I would like to see a 28 hp gain on a stock Fbody.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.