LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Opting out of Optispark?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #1  
shlby123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Opting out of Optispark?

Hi Im relatively new to F-bodies and have a 94 Formula Firebird, and was curious because I was told there is a way to swap out the whole optispark system for the setup ran in the newer LS1s is this true? Are there write ups for it?
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #2  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
The Delteq and LTCC kits are two of the popular ones. Delteq has installation manuals on their site, it gives you an idea of what is involved and what is needed: http://www.delteq.com/support_manuals.htm
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #3  
shlby123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Wow! That's pretty interesting. So what kind of plain sight benefits does this have for the LT1 cars?
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 03:29 PM
  #4  
sandman63's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 467
From: Winnipeg, MB
Didnt GMHTP do a write up on this? Im pretty sure its the current issue too.
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #5  
tornLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 60
From: TX
Originally Posted by sandman63
Didnt GMHTP do a write up on this? Im pretty sure its the current issue too.
Is this magazine in places like barnes & noble?
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 06:44 PM
  #6  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
Originally Posted by tor5ionLT1
Is this magazine in places like barnes & noble?
The Barnes & Noble by me carries it, as does some of the local Wal-Marts and Borders. You may be able to read the article on their website.
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 11:46 PM
  #7  
Redbird1993's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17
From: Sarasota, Florida
I use the Bailey Eng. LTCC Ignition. It uses the crank trigger part of the opti unit. It has a brain box with a soft touch or hard rev limiter, nitrous retard and other extra functions. I use 8 LS2 coils, unlike deltecs 4. I have had it on the car for about a year and a half and several thousand miles. I fabbed brackets for the coils and self installed all of it . It has never missed a lick, I an very happy with it. LTCC- $400, Coils $100 on ebay, still need to get a set of custom magnacore wires ( recommended ) about $100 bucks. Although the Moroso blue Maxx wires I am using have worked fine. Check it out at
www.bailey-eng.com/LTCC.html
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #8  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Don't be too quick to replace the opti, despite it's reputation it is a good piece. It is lack of maitenence that give it a bad rap.
People leave a cap and rotor on till it fails then blame the design. Thing is cap and rotor are WEAR ITEMS as such they are tuneup parts. Not saying you have to replace them yearly or anything just if you leave it on for 100k and it starts to run poorly replace the cap and rotor and you will probably be good for another 100K.

As you should be able to see by now NONE of the "opti elimination" kits truely eliminates it, they just bypass the cap and rotor and you could buy 3 MSD cap and rotor kits for the price of one of the "opti elimination" kits.

I am not saying those kits are bad or anyting just that the "benifits" are grossly overstated and when folks talk about the giant difference they made for them it is usually being compared to to a neglected stock system that needed some attention and they is why they bought parts.
People in general are not objective enough to consider the fact that replacing 80K mile plugs, wires, cap and rotor with just fresh stock pieces would be a performance improvement and that everything they feel is not comming from the new coil setup but rather replacing worn components.
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 09:15 AM
  #9  
Joe B's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 414
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Don't be too quick to replace the opti, despite it's reputation it is a good piece. It is lack of maitenence that give it a bad rap.
People leave a cap and rotor on till it fails then blame the design. Thing is cap and rotor are WEAR ITEMS as such they are tuneup parts. Not saying you have to replace them yearly or anything just if you leave it on for 100k and it starts to run poorly replace the cap and rotor and you will probably be good for another 100K.

As you should be able to see by now NONE of the "opti elimination" kits truely eliminates it, they just bypass the cap and rotor and you could buy 3 MSD cap and rotor kits for the price of one of the "opti elimination" kits.

I am not saying those kits are bad or anyting just that the "benifits" are grossly overstated and when folks talk about the giant difference they made for them it is usually being compared to to a neglected stock system that needed some attention and they is why they bought parts.
People in general are not objective enough to consider the fact that replacing 80K mile plugs, wires, cap and rotor with just fresh stock pieces would be a performance improvement and that everything they feel is not comming from the new coil setup but rather replacing worn components.
I couldn't agree more ........
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 12:30 PM
  #10  
FireFox5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47
I agree with above, there is no "opti-eliminator" out. Someone needs to invent a system that uses the cam and crank sensor to determine spark timing. That is how every other DIS system works.
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #11  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,086
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Electromotive built an Opti-Eliminator/Super Direct Ignition (O-E/SDI) system back in the late 90's. Completely eliminated the Opti. I ran one for two years. But it had issues of its own. They put a "hold" on production, and never solved the problems and restarted. The engineer who designed the E'motive system also designed the Delteq.

The problems with the Opti relate to corner-cutting by the GM Corporate bean counters. The seals are poor, particularly at the wire tower. The bearing is cheap and wears out way too fast. Cheap, uncoated carbon steel on the stock bearing retainer rusts and the rust particle blind the optical sensor. The water pump weep holes really could have been thought through better. There are far too many premature failures rusulting form these problems to simply write them off as maintenance problems. GM had an excellent idea (actually, they got the idea from a Chrysler/Misubishi 3.0L V6), but then screwed it up with poor execution. They pretty much admitted to missing the ozone problem, adding the vent system after the fact.

The optical sensor is an excellent cam position sensor, and those of us who deleted the high voltage function for the Opti up to 9 years ago have not experienced much in the way of problems.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff1904
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Jun 5, 2016 05:00 PM
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 AM
colts0455
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Sep 27, 2015 01:07 PM
z28newbie
Site Help and Suggestions
1
Sep 9, 2015 10:26 AM
z28newbie
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 9, 2015 10:26 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.