LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

opinions for most power with these requirements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 07:50 PM
  #1  
NewbieWar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,370
From: Germany
opinions for most power with these requirements

ok these requirements...

Smog legal (california)
Natural asperated (last option)
will be daily driver...

so i will probably pull my motor out and get a few renches together... what all should i do while im in there... i wanna build it as powerful as i can. it'll probably be in a year or so when the car is paid off, thats when i'll have no money issues. but i wanna get a under 12 seconds if i can.

its stock. at the moment.
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 07:54 PM
  #2  
Zack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,310
From: Glendale, Ca
you wont need to pull the motor and go all out to go sub 12's. Just a good head/cam combo
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 07:56 PM
  #3  
NewbieWar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,370
From: Germany
let me deck it out... sorry im a newbie to how much power cams add... but i wanna reinforce whatever to handle supercharging (much later down the road) and get as quick as i can.

i wanna change the valve springs and what not to get to 6500 rpms...
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 08:22 PM
  #4  
Spinner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,945
From: Fort Benning, GA
305 cam
Longtubes (Mac midlengths or the good SLP shorties if you cant pass visual)
Hi flow cat
3" Y pipe,
3" cat-back
2800+ (as high as your comfy with) stall converter
CAI
Ported Heads

~350+ rwhp, mid-low 12s, emissions friendly
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #5  
my94blackz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,064
From: Dobson, NC
Light is the key word. Light rods but not aluminum, plus they have to be strong. I myself wouldnt go past a 4.030 bore due to cylnder wall thickness. Probably a 9.5:1 to 10:1 CR if your gonna supercharge it. tiny cam if emissions is that bad.
Old Dec 21, 2003 | 03:21 PM
  #6  
NewbieWar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,370
From: Germany
why dont i want a high compresssion ratio for supercharging it?

would supercharging give a lot more power with higher compression ratios?

what accually defines the compression ratio? isnt that mostly based upon the heads and the cam?

also w/ h/c combo, lt4 valves and springs intake and whatever else lt4 includes excluding cam and maybe head., 383 stroker kit, supercharging

what kinda flywheel hp would i expect?
Old Dec 21, 2003 | 03:28 PM
  #7  
Zack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,310
From: Glendale, Ca
www.howstuffworks.com will start you out with some basic knowledge of engines. and a search will net plenty of reading to learn from
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
May 1, 2015 01:14 PM
XtremeLt1
Car Audio and Electronics
12
Sep 13, 2002 08:50 PM
Omega9
Car Audio and Electronics
2
Aug 2, 2002 12:33 AM
Wilson
Car Audio and Electronics
0
Jul 21, 2002 05:08 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.