LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2005, 09:59 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KillerTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,119
OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.

All I have is a catback right now.

What I'm looking for, is for someone to confirm that this cam will give me some decent gains and be ok for the engine.


I can't do headers first because I don't have the facilities to do it and I'm getting a good deal on installation for the cam.

Also, what kind of springs and rockers can I get that are good but reasonabley priced?
Thanks!
KillerTA is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 10:09 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Z95m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: newton, kansas, USA
Posts: 6,069
Re: OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.

I would run come 987 springs, and get some comp pro mags. You won't see any huge gains with that cam with stock manifolds.
Z95m6 is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 10:19 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Capt'n Two Rotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 165
Re: OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.

I have the 987's and I would recommend not getting them, If you do you will have to get the heads machined and use NSA rockers. I would get 918's
Capt'n Two Rotors is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 10:43 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Z95m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: newton, kansas, USA
Posts: 6,069
Re: OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.

Originally Posted by Capt'n Two Rotors
I have the 987's and I would recommend not getting them, If you do you will have to get the heads machined and use NSA rockers. I would get 918's

Thats false you don't need to machine the heads. Almost everyone runs NSA rockers so thats not a big deal.
Z95m6 is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 10:54 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.

I'd do the 918's too, better springs to start with anyways. Comp 987's are OLD technology.

Guys the 918's are so far ahead of the curve it's silly, lots of well know people in the cam bussiness are leary of them but in these cars they are perfect, and the results show.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 06:48 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KillerTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,119
Re: OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.

ttt one more time.

I know I won't be near max potential for the cam but is it reasonalbe to assume that I'll still gain some good hp/tq gains?

There's so much info about different cams when I search that it's hard to get a definite answer.
KillerTA is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 06:55 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
JBird33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 237
Re: OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.

You will most surely see some power from doing it; but just how much is hard to say. Almost everyone has headers by the time they do a cam, so it's difficult to say how much the stockers will be holding you back. I say go ahead and do it, but make headers a priority.
JBird33 is offline  
Old 04-02-2005, 10:47 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Capt'n Two Rotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 165
Re: OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.

Originally Posted by Z95m6
Thats false you don't need to machine the heads. Almost everyone runs NSA rockers so thats not a big deal.
I'm not trying to start a B#tch session but just be cautious with what you read and people tell you, Comp Cams even told me no need to machine and no locators needed. I talked to several people that had theres set up that way. Maybe I just have a weird set of heads but we just slapped them on an had coil bind at .400 lift. Also there is noting to locate the spring except the valve stem seal,not good. Also, unless you want to cut .100 out of the heads(not recommended), you can use the +.050 locks from comp but this will only leave about .020 of valve stem above the reatiner, not enough for SA rockers. The reason I know this is I just got done going through all this unseen and unexpectedly. Also regular SBC guide plates will not work you need a set designed for LT1 or bowtie heads.

Troy
Capt'n Two Rotors is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
HarleyZ28
Cars For Sale
1
10-05-2015 06:23 AM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
1
05-06-2015 07:49 AM
Red_94Formula
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
01-22-2015 12:17 AM



Quick Reply: OK, I'm going with the cc306, 1.6 rr's, springs, and leaving everything else stock.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.