LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

new track times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 06:58 PM
  #1  
NEOS97SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 229
From: wichita, KS, USA
new track times

ill start with my current set up i have a 97 SS A4 3.23's 275/40/17's LT1. i have ramair with a K&N filter, descreened my MAF, 1LE intake elbow, airfoil, stock throttle body w/ TB bypass, i did the FRA mod to get cooler air into the engine bay, i have a 160 stat, BBK UD pulley, taylor 8mm wires, new coil, new denso iridium plugs, new AC Delco o2's with extensions, i have 1 3/4" jet hot longtubes coated with no emissions, no EGR, no AIR, block off plates on both of the holes in the back of the intake, i have a custom 2 1/2" primaries into a 3" collector Y-pipe, i have a 3" cut out after the Y between it and the 3" custom flowmaster catback, i just put in the OBD1 conversion with custom tune for my mods from PCM4LESS with an LT4 KM.
so far that all the mods i have.
i didnt have the tune or plugs or o2s in and i had a really rich condition and a miss but all excuses aside this is what i ran in ks
1300ft above sea level 98* 95% hum and 29.96"Hg were the conditions
2.135 60'
14.063 1/4
99.144mph


is this slow and if so what should i be runnin
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 08:04 PM
  #2  
NEOS97SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 229
From: wichita, KS, USA
ttt
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 10:00 AM
  #3  
NEOS97SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 229
From: wichita, KS, USA
ttt
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 10:17 AM
  #4  
importeater's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 519
From: Nazareth, PA
Looks like the heat hurt ya bad! You should be running better times then me and if I could hook up I'd be 13.5-13.7 I think.. You should be looking at 13.2-13.5 I would think @ 103 or so..
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 10:19 AM
  #5  
reuter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 343
From: 757 VA
Unhappy

well you should probably get a stall for your car but man you should be running faster than that. way faster i would think.

here's what i ran / my setup:

garage ported/descreened MAF, k&n fipk, slp exhaust on crappy 235/55/16 all-weather radials - 13.9 @ 104 on a 2.3 60'

now my car is a 6 speed but you have WAY more mods than i do. i would guess your car should be running mid 13s especially with those long tubes on there. make your next mod a stall and im sure those times will go way down. but your mph is crap too. i guess it was a little hot/humid but damn
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #6  
CeeBee94Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 742
From: Owego, New York
Thats not a bad time at all...the humidity plays a HUGE roll...me and a couple buddies went last week and we all ran terrible because there was 100% humidity and it was pretty warm, but it is the humidity that kills ya...

My buddy in his 00 Z28 ran a best of 13.9xx @ 103 that day, when his best is a 13.47 @107 and change I believe and the only thing he has done to his car was add the SLP lid, the 13.47 was bone stock....so a 14.0 isn't that bad with that humidity
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 10:38 AM
  #7  
NEOS97SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 229
From: wichita, KS, USA
well it was the first time out to the track for me since the mods and everybody said it was the weather cause my buddys 00 TA who has a best of 13.37 at 105 with longtubes and a lid ran 13.98 and my other bud with a 99 C5 whos best is a 12.56 was runnin 13.12.
i just thought my times sucked *** and my next mod is gonna be a 2800 stall so hopefully ill have some better times.
im goin to the track this fri so hopefully ill get some better weather and traction with DR's ill post my new times with my new comp plugs and o2's. and DR's if i get to use them
thanks everybody for postin
Old Aug 16, 2003 | 12:36 AM
  #8  
NEOS97SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 229
From: wichita, KS, USA
NEW TRACK TIMES 8/15/03!!!!

i ran a new best at the worst track in the world. i ran
2.127 60'
9.047 660'(1/8)
13.973 1/4
100.686 mph
conditions were 1300ft above sea level
82 F
76% hum
30.20 bar press.

so whats everybodythink
and thats on radials with none of my susp mods yet.
Old Aug 16, 2003 | 03:46 AM
  #9  
revtime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,734
From: Kansas City suburb of
Those are not bad times.
I have Ed Wright tuning and Hooker LTs with header mufflers, K&N FIPK, Accel 300+, 1LE elbow, blah blah blah, and I ran a 13.60@102 which is not as good as I had hoped. Now since then I have beaten an 01 SS on the highway and tonite I spanked one of them supercharged ford lightnings so I don,t think I am doing too bad.
My 60s sucked bad and I think if I can hook it up it will do a 13.3@104.
HOPEFULLY.
Old Aug 16, 2003 | 06:19 PM
  #10  
jarek5_7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 40
From: Radom, Poland
today I hit 14.19 et+rt
I have stock `95 Camaro T56, i have only cone filter.
mods are comming up
wide 18 inch wheels, with street tires.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Feffman
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
4
Oct 9, 2015 05:42 AM
Louey
Pacific
1
Jan 25, 2015 12:22 AM
Louey
Pacific
1
Dec 25, 2014 03:27 AM
GRN96WS6
Car Audio and Electronics
0
Sep 8, 2002 10:45 PM
teedoff59
Car Audio and Electronics
0
Aug 8, 2002 01:36 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.