i forget what bench it was because we have a few but i will let you know tomorrow. and basically we set it up as you are supposed to and formed the molding clay around the outside of the port so the air will vortex in , measured at standard (28) and came up with the #s i will have more info for yall tomorrow

 

Lloyd flows at 26.

 

am i sensing a "thou shall not compare thyself to Lloyd" tone ...

 

No no no.... I'm just saying I wouldn't be jumping for joy comparing those numbers to a head flowed completely different.

 

I don't give a **** who ports what.....if you put the heads on and the bitch goes faster you get credit.

don't care about dyno's and flow neches.....put the number up on the big end. Proof is in the pudding...

 

i am simply stating for my first time P&P heads and get pretty crazy #s With stock valves ( I REPEAT STOCK VALVES) is pretty cool to me. i am only comparing them to lloyds heads because everyone knows how well they flow. I am a big fan of lloyds work, but these heads will ATLEAST flow as good as the Le2 heads. and it only cost me about $3 for the WD40 and thats it. so you tell me if you have the equipment to do it would you rather pay $3 or $1400-$1700 for heads.

 

a-men.

this is not a hit on the original poster.. that goes out to anyone.

make 'em run ladies!

 

Either way .... racing flowbenches =
Making a head perform on a flow bench won't make it perform where it matters, at the track.

 

I'm in no way trying to say your heads suck. I was just wanting to make sure that when you are using his numbers for comparison you are taking into account that the heads have been flowed differently so there will be a difference. 28" will give you inflated numbers. If you flowed these the same as Lloyd I'd think you'd be more around 255-260cfm at 600. Not bad numbers at all for stock valves on stock castings! But just so you know on Lloyd's bench your heads don't flow the same.

At any rate you saved yourself some money and have a nice set of heads to use!

 

It's not racing flow benches. It's making valid comparisons. Would you not agree that two heads flowed on different benches will flow different numbers? I'm not saying it will make power ... I'm saying he is making a comparison based on two different methods of flowing heads. It's like giving STD HP readings instead of SAE, everyone bitches about it.

 

Then he must be the only person who flows them at 26" out there, you might want to re-check your info. If you want to see what my LE2's flowed at 28" pm me and I'll show you the flowcharts, but I don't want to completly hi-jack this thread.

 

well i waiting on my new valves and seats so as soon as they get here and put in i will give yall the new #s but you are correct.

FLOW #S DONT MEAN JACK COMPARED TO THE TRACK!!!!

 

You going to do light weight valves? Reducing the weight in the valve train makes for some nice pick ups.

 

yes got some titanium valves coming, but are you positive lloyed measures a 26 because that is the old standard the new standard is 28 and ill have to agree with speed demon i dont see why he would be the only one useing that scale. but yea i am almost done building the engine its a brand new bottom end P&P heads CC503,comp pro mags 1.6,hardend pushrods,cc lifters, and all bolt ons i am hoping to make around 380rwhp through a 6-speed

 

like mdacton said, flow #s dont really mean anything.

Id rather have velocity and a good AVERAGE flow.
i.e.
200,240, 260 compared to something like 160, 190, 300 (.400, .500, .600 respectively).