LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

moroso vs. k&n

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 06:39 PM
  #1  
s i c trans am's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 143
moroso vs. k&n

which cold ar kit is better the k&n or moroso one?
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 06:47 PM
  #2  
chevy94c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 1,088
From: Mass
Re: moroso vs. k&n

I would say they area about the same. I got the moroso cai because it's alot cheap price.
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #3  
matt65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 491
From: Lincoln, AL
Re: moroso vs. k&n

Yeah they are very similar. I have the K&N because it came on my car when I bought it. I would get the cheaper of the two.
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 07:31 PM
  #4  
Feenix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 346
From: ohio
Re: moroso vs. k&n

Im very fond of the Moroso unit because of 2 friends that had problems with the K&N FIPK filter falling off constantly. My Moroso seems to have a bigger filter as well and was cheaper but a small margin. Not to mention im very happy with it.
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 09:46 PM
  #5  
guywithaZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 432
From: KCMO
Re: moroso vs. k&n

I have the KN and the filter has never given me any problems falling off after 6 years...also last year the rubber conector from the intake tube to the MAF was lookin really bad I called up KN and they sent me one for free no hassel...they great customer service so and a great product so they get my nod...
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #6  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Re: moroso vs. k&n

I have no complaints with my lingenfelter...
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 09:50 PM
  #7  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Re: moroso vs. k&n

Both are ok, but why not buy a Lingenfelter one for cheaper than both and save some money plus get a bigger K&N conical filter than either other one has. Also tightening the filter on the LPE seems easier than many other setups since you do it from the top.

-Dustin-
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 11:15 PM
  #8  
cas0484's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 422
From: Lake Mary, Florida
Re: moroso vs. k&n

I have the K&N but two of my friends have the moroso and they are both about the same. Personally, I'd buy the cheap of the two. I only got my K&N because my neighbor was selling it for 75 bucks
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 11:20 PM
  #9  
turbo_Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,515
From: Kansas
Re: moroso vs. k&n

Go for the cheaper one IMO. Oh and btw I have had my K&N filter fall off once.
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 12:53 AM
  #10  
TobyZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,325
From: BC
Re: moroso vs. k&n

I had my K&N fall off once. This is almost always because A) its not on right or B) after cleaning and oiling the filter, the installer didn't clean the rubber lip of oil.

If you clean the rubber contact portion of the K&N and install it right, it will not fall off.
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 01:40 AM
  #11  
nin97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 394
From: Surrey, BC
Re: moroso vs. k&n

i have the K&N because my girlfriend bought me it

thats when i knew she was a keeper
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 01:43 AM
  #12  
Bersaglieri's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,907
From: The Wild West
Re: moroso vs. k&n

Same here, G/F caught me off gaurd with a LPE box one night. Definately a keeper.

-Dustin-
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jul 3, 2015 02:10 PM
Koby
Cars For Sale
0
Jun 28, 2015 04:46 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 AM.