MAC Midlength Header DYNO results!!!
I know people are curious to see MAC header results, so here they are.
I just got back from the dyno. I dynoed SAE:
SAE 284rwhp / 318rwtq I love the TQ numbers
with the mods below. My a/f was right at 12.8 until 4000 RPM - 5800 RPM where it dropped to 12.0. So there is some more power in it yet. Also consider that I am still running through a single CAT. I bet if I get it leaned back to 13.0 and removed the cat, I would easily be over 290 rwhp / 320 rwtq.
Here is a link to the dyno sheet. I love the TQ below 4500 RPM. The dyno sheet is STD numbers, but you can see the correction factor to SAE was only 1.01 so all the numbers just need to be divided by 1.01 to get SAE numbers.
Mac Midlength Headers, Carsound Cat, Hooker Catback, K&N FIPK
I made an Excel graph of a good running stock '97 M6 vs my dyno results.
Here it is. Please right click, save as:
Stock vs MAC Header Chart
Dan
I just got back from the dyno. I dynoed SAE:
SAE 284rwhp / 318rwtq I love the TQ numbers
with the mods below. My a/f was right at 12.8 until 4000 RPM - 5800 RPM where it dropped to 12.0. So there is some more power in it yet. Also consider that I am still running through a single CAT. I bet if I get it leaned back to 13.0 and removed the cat, I would easily be over 290 rwhp / 320 rwtq.
Here is a link to the dyno sheet. I love the TQ below 4500 RPM. The dyno sheet is STD numbers, but you can see the correction factor to SAE was only 1.01 so all the numbers just need to be divided by 1.01 to get SAE numbers.
Mac Midlength Headers, Carsound Cat, Hooker Catback, K&N FIPK
I made an Excel graph of a good running stock '97 M6 vs my dyno results.
Here it is. Please right click, save as:
Stock vs MAC Header Chart
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; Sep 20, 2004 at 08:43 PM.
Thanks.
Unfortunately, no. Most of the stock M6 LT1's run about 250-255rwhp / 285 rwtq stock though.
I really like my low end TQ. It definately follows header theory that a smaller diameter tube (1 5/8") helps to keep exhaust speeds high at low RPM's. Since that helps scavenging, the TQ numbers look great down low. I mean, my rwtq doesn't drop below 310 even at 1800 RPM. It can make me suffer up top, but I think I would need quite a bit more HP before the 1 5/8" primaries start to choke my engine.
I'm not sure what LT's dyno at with similar mods, but keep in mind that I have a cat in my system, which LT's typically don't, so I'd probably gain a good 5 rwhp easy if I took it out.
I can't wait to put a cam in. If I can keep the TQ that I have down low, and extend the TQ curve to a higher RPM with the cam, the HP numbers will shoot up like crazy. I'm glad I bought the MACs.
Oh yeah, thanks to Motown Muscle for setting up the dyno day.
Dan
Unfortunately, no. Most of the stock M6 LT1's run about 250-255rwhp / 285 rwtq stock though.
I really like my low end TQ. It definately follows header theory that a smaller diameter tube (1 5/8") helps to keep exhaust speeds high at low RPM's. Since that helps scavenging, the TQ numbers look great down low. I mean, my rwtq doesn't drop below 310 even at 1800 RPM. It can make me suffer up top, but I think I would need quite a bit more HP before the 1 5/8" primaries start to choke my engine.
I'm not sure what LT's dyno at with similar mods, but keep in mind that I have a cat in my system, which LT's typically don't, so I'd probably gain a good 5 rwhp easy if I took it out.
I can't wait to put a cam in. If I can keep the TQ that I have down low, and extend the TQ curve to a higher RPM with the cam, the HP numbers will shoot up like crazy. I'm glad I bought the MACs.
Oh yeah, thanks to Motown Muscle for setting up the dyno day.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; Apr 25, 2004 at 02:53 PM.
I rode in stereos car today and it ran awesome. It actually feels faster than the dyno numbers indicate. I was impressed. I went inside the shop today and they had the hooker aerochamber muff for 60 bucks. I am def gonna swap my lm for the hooker.
nice meeting you today Dan. Dan is a top notch guy.
Brandon
nice meeting you today Dan. Dan is a top notch guy.
Brandon
Nice numbers, Dan!
Here's mine: http://www.jonaadland.com/NewPics3/Baseline.JPG
That's with FLP's, 3.5" Mufflex/Borla XR-1, No Cats & "Lousy" G2 CAI
I've never put much faith in that theory on these cars. My dyno above doesn't support it either. Of course both systems would need to be tested on the same car for an accurate comparison....just food for thought.
Originally posted by stereomandan
I'm not sure what LT's dyno at with similar mods,
I'm not sure what LT's dyno at with similar mods,
That's with FLP's, 3.5" Mufflex/Borla XR-1, No Cats & "Lousy" G2 CAI
It definately follows header theory that a smaller diameter tube (1 5/8") helps to keep exaust speeds high at low RPM's. Since that helps scavenging, the TQ numbers look great down low.
Looks good Jon!
I think the cat is hurting me about 5 hp or so, plus running at 12.0 A/F above 4000 RPM doesn't help either.
Once I get that worked out, I bet I'll be at about 290 rwhp/322 rwtq.
Dan
I think the cat is hurting me about 5 hp or so, plus running at 12.0 A/F above 4000 RPM doesn't help either.
Once I get that worked out, I bet I'll be at about 290 rwhp/322 rwtq.
Dan
My #'s are in sig, I have 1.6 rr's though, but I also have an A4 which hurts dyno #'s. I put out 318 rwhp STD just to compare. Oh yeah, my LT's didn't hurt lowend torque at all, if anything they helped it. I still have too much torque to know what to do with. Oh yeah, people say the dyno I went to reads 10-15ft lbs low on the torque side...
Nice #'s man. I just got my car dyno'ed also with my Hooker LT's and cutout open. I only put out 283rwhp and 319rwtq but i got a lot more in the car. I was running very rich. I was at mid 11 a/f most of the rpm range and up top i was high to mid 10 a/f.
Speed demon
Thanks for the numbers to compare with. You don't have a cat right?
I think 1.6 RR's are supposed to get you at least 10-15 rwhp, so take that off and you are at 287-292 rwhp. Through an A4, that is great!
Yeah, today was a dyno day, and the LS1 guys said that the dyno was reading low today, but I think they were just acting a little tough. A guy that dynoed 375 SAE before supposedly only dynoed 360 SAE today.
I'm not questioning my numbers though. They seem to be right on what I thought they would be. I was thinking I might reach 290, and without the cat, I'm pretty sure I'd be there.
Dan
Thanks for the numbers to compare with. You don't have a cat right?
I think 1.6 RR's are supposed to get you at least 10-15 rwhp, so take that off and you are at 287-292 rwhp. Through an A4, that is great!
Yeah, today was a dyno day, and the LS1 guys said that the dyno was reading low today, but I think they were just acting a little tough. A guy that dynoed 375 SAE before supposedly only dynoed 360 SAE today.
I'm not questioning my numbers though. They seem to be right on what I thought they would be. I was thinking I might reach 290, and without the cat, I'm pretty sure I'd be there.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; Apr 26, 2004 at 05:00 PM.
Originally posted by drewstealth
Nice #'s man. I just got my car dyno'ed also with my Hooker LT's and cutout open. I only put out 283rwhp and 319rwtq but i got a lot more in the car. I was running very rich. I was at mid 11 a/f most of the rpm range and up top i was high to mid 10 a/f.
Nice #'s man. I just got my car dyno'ed also with my Hooker LT's and cutout open. I only put out 283rwhp and 319rwtq but i got a lot more in the car. I was running very rich. I was at mid 11 a/f most of the rpm range and up top i was high to mid 10 a/f.
BTW, my 284/318 numbers are SAE corrected.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; Apr 24, 2004 at 07:53 PM.
Originally posted by stereomandan
Speed demon
Thanks for the numbers to compare with. You don't have a cat right?
I think 1.6 RR's are supposed to get you at least 10-15 rwhp, so take that off and you are at 287-292 rwhp. Through an A4, that is great!
Yeah, today was a dyno day, and the LS1 guys said that the dyno was reading low today, but I think they were just trying to act tough. A guy that dynoed 375 SAE before only dynoed 360 SAE today.
I'm not questioning my numbers though. They seem to be right on what I thought they would be. I was thinking I might reach 290, and without the cat, I'm pretty sure I'd be there.
Dan
Speed demon
Thanks for the numbers to compare with. You don't have a cat right?
I think 1.6 RR's are supposed to get you at least 10-15 rwhp, so take that off and you are at 287-292 rwhp. Through an A4, that is great!
Yeah, today was a dyno day, and the LS1 guys said that the dyno was reading low today, but I think they were just trying to act tough. A guy that dynoed 375 SAE before only dynoed 360 SAE today.
I'm not questioning my numbers though. They seem to be right on what I thought they would be. I was thinking I might reach 290, and without the cat, I'm pretty sure I'd be there.
Dan
Originally posted by speed_demon24
No cats, through a hooker catback with an 18" bullet in the I-pipe.
No cats, through a hooker catback with an 18" bullet in the I-pipe.
Dan



