LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

lt4 hot cam questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2010, 12:36 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
95TALT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Amarillo,Tx
Posts: 82
lt4 hot cam questions

I tried to find the answers myself but was not having any luck. I know there are better cams out there then the lt4 hot cam. I dont have a lot of money to spend but I am wanting a little bit of an up grade on the cheap. Im having trouble finding some specs on valve spring sizes. Can I run a lt4 hot cam with stock lt1 springs? If not will lt4 springs work on stock lt1 heads with out machining the heads? If it works on stock lt1 springs with 1.5 I may run it that way for a while. Maybe upgrade the spring/rockers later. Thanks in advance for any help.
95TALT1 is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 02:04 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Mswezey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas - College. DF-Dub, when not in college
Posts: 312
From what i've read the stock springs suck basically.

you'll want at least Lt4 springs for a hotcam if not better (future purposes perhaps?)

no head work should be required and it's quite simple to change springs out.

I'm running beehive 918's, about $197 and hopefully if everything goes right ill be getting 1.6 rockers. BTW I have a cam that is spec'd out to be similar if not the same as a lt4 hot cam. But stock springs would be a no no...some say they have done ok, but a lot others say they end up with coil bind
Mswezey is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 07:46 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
95mysticta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Posts: 685
To be honest by the time you have all the rest of the parts that go with a cam swap your better off spending the extra cash and getting a better cam/springs. I have the Hotcam in my dads 95 and works very well for what he does with the car. But like i said when the parts list adds up and you try and get as much bang for the buck its smarter to save an extra couple hundred on a better cam/springs. Not trying to tell you that the hotcam is a bad cam as its a good street cam but you can use something like a comp cam 503 which will net you easily 10-20rwhp for a little bit bigger of a cam.

Just a suggestion, good luck! Guarantee it will put a serious grin on your face when your get it put together and first start it.
95mysticta is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 09:57 AM
  #4  
sbs
Registered User
 
sbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 1,155
Originally Posted by 95TALT1
I tried to find the answers myself but was not having any luck.
Really?

Can I run a lt4 hot cam with stock lt1 springs?
http://tinyurl.com/2uva4x5
sbs is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 10:24 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Z28SORR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Friendswood, TX, USA
Posts: 3,769
http://paceperformance.com/index.asp...D&ProdID=22705

Better off buying the KIT, you'll save in the long run.
Z28SORR is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 10:56 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
pgerst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Westminster, CA
Posts: 349
The LT4/1.6RR yields about .3 more inch lift at the intake valve and about .2 at the exhaust. LT1/1.5RR lift at valve is .447 for intake and .459 for the exhaust; I have read rumors that GM said it was OK to use just the lt4 cam in an otherwise stock LT1. My quick math: The LT4 valve lift spec I have is .476/.479 I/E, as the 1.5 versus 1.6RR works out to 7% less lift, that puts the LT4/1.5RR valve lift at about .46 inch. So you would need the ability to compress the LT1 springs at least an additional .013; i do not know if this can occur without bind or not. You could take off a valve cover and measure the closed clearances on I/E valve springs to determine this.

Some of the more experienced engine guys will correct me but I believe that a good portion of the horsepower gains from the LT4/1.6 come from the extra rpm the lt4 can make (engines were rated at 6300 and 5700 respectively), which, for purposes of this topic, becomes a function of valve spring rates (besides cam/RR, there are also differences in the lt1/lt4 cylinder head which added hp as well.) The LT1 springs have less closing strength and will start to float at the higher rpms (frankly, I suspect they already do at the 5700 redline.)

The peak torque ratings are the same (340, although 500 rpm lower at 4000 on LT1.) Without the ability to turn extra rpm (and w/o lt4 heads), i think you may get more bang for your buck going the other way, lt1 cam with 1.6RR/springs? Also I think there are aftermarket cams that are designed for the LT1 heads that may be cheaper/better?
pgerst is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 11:14 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Woodstown, NJ
Posts: 4,154
Originally Posted by pgerst
The LT4/1.6RR yields about .3 more inch lift at the intake valve and about .2 at the exhaust. LT1/1.5RR lift at valve is .447 for intake and .459 for the exhaust; I have read rumors that GM said it was OK to use just the lt4 cam in an otherwise stock LT1. My quick math: The LT4 valve lift spec I have is .476/.479 I/E, as the 1.5 versus 1.6RR works out to 7% less lift, that puts the LT4/1.5RR valve lift at about .46 inch. So you would need the ability to compress the LT1 springs at least an additional .013; i do not know if this can occur without bind or not. You could take off a valve cover and measure the closed clearances on I/E valve springs to determine this.

Some of the more experienced engine guys will correct me but I believe that a good portion of the horsepower gains from the LT4/1.6 come from the extra rpm the lt4 can make (engines were rated at 6300 and 5700 respectively), which, for purposes of this topic, becomes a function of valve spring rates (besides cam/RR, there are also differences in the lt1/lt4 cylinder head which added hp as well.) The LT1 springs have less closing strength and will start to float at the higher rpms (frankly, I suspect they already do at the 5700 redline.)

The peak torque ratings are the same (340, although 500 rpm lower at 4000 on LT1.) Without the ability to turn extra rpm (and w/o lt4 heads), i think you may get more bang for your buck going the other way, lt1 cam with 1.6RR/springs? Also I think there are aftermarket cams that are designed for the LT1 heads that may be cheaper/better?
The HP/TQ ratings you are posting apply to the factory LT4 cam, not the LT4 HOT cam. There is a very big difference, so unfortunately your analysis doesn't apply to the OP. Additionally, all the math has already been done. You simply cannot use any cam other than stock with factory valve springs.

If the OP wants a cam swap on the cheap side of things, it is hard to beat the hotcam kit. Everything is included and, while it is dated, still provides decent bang for your buck. Undoubtedly there are better grinds available, but with the hotcam kit there are no questions asked as far as parts selection is concerned. Add a timing set, gaskets, and a tune and you're ready to roll.
RamAir95TA is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 12:00 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
pgerst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Westminster, CA
Posts: 349
Good point on the two lt4 cams; which means the required clearance works out even worse on the hot cam.
pgerst is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 01:20 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
GRIDERMAN87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oklahoma---405
Posts: 365
YES you can run your stock springs w the cam i do w 1.5 rockers too
GRIDERMAN87 is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 01:22 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Woodstown, NJ
Posts: 4,154
Originally Posted by GRIDERMAN87
YES you can run your stock springs w the cam i do w 1.5 rockers too
You are running the LT4 hotcam on stock springs? Man are you tempting fate.
RamAir95TA is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 01:25 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
GRIDERMAN87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oklahoma---405
Posts: 365
drive it everyday with 1.5 rockers it lowers lift enough for the stock springs to hold, it wont work with 1.6s
GRIDERMAN87 is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 01:48 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
pgerst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Westminster, CA
Posts: 349
Griderman87 -- do you know how much clearance you have on the springs when open?
pgerst is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 02:11 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Woodstown, NJ
Posts: 4,154
The stock cam has a net lift of .447/.459 with stock 1.5 rockers. The LT4 hotcam has a net lift of .492/.492 with stock 1.5 rockers. Stock springs start to bind at .480" lift. They aren't binding to the point where you're going to experience catastrophic failure because your lifter plungers are what's taking the beating. But don't expect it to last much longer.

Last edited by RamAir95TA; 07-23-2010 at 02:14 PM.
RamAir95TA is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 02:18 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
pgerst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Westminster, CA
Posts: 349
That is amazing that it is working. Though this is what I love about the orphan LT1, it's the modern day flat head and we are true hot rodders, making our own performance.
pgerst is offline  
Old 07-23-2010, 03:49 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
GRIDERMAN87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oklahoma---405
Posts: 365
there rated to hold .500
GRIDERMAN87 is offline  


Quick Reply: lt4 hot cam questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.