LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

LT1 383 build question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 04:11 PM
  #1  
rocknroler69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
LT1 383 build question

I want the compression ratio somewhere between 10.5-11. Ive found a few combos that would work

54cc combustion chambers (stock 350 head) with a head gasket .080in =11.08 to 1 ratio

62cc combustion chamber heads with .039in head gasket = 11.17 to 1 ratio

64cc combustion chamber heads with .039in head gasket = 10.86 to 1 ratio


Which one do you guys think would be better for a STREET ONLY car, or do you have other thoughts and combinations. I dont plan on driving it everyday but would still want to be able to, this car wont see any track time

Any input helps
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 04:22 PM
  #2  
Psycho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 61
Re: LT1 383 build question

Just put premium in it and forget it. You will be good to go.
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 04:24 PM
  #3  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,152
From: Woodstown, NJ
Re: LT1 383 build question

Originally Posted by rocknroler69
I want the compression ratio somewhere between 10.5-11. Ive found a few combos that would work

54cc combustion chambers (stock 350 head) with a head gasket .080in =11.08 to 1 ratio

62cc combustion chamber heads with .039in head gasket = 11.17 to 1 ratio

64cc combustion chamber heads with .039in head gasket = 10.86 to 1 ratio


Which one do you guys think would be better for a STREET ONLY car, or do you have other thoughts and combinations. I dont plan on driving it everyday but would still want to be able to, this car wont see any track time

Any input helps
Compression ratio is also determined by things like deck height, cylinder bore and piston valve reliefs/dish. Did you include them in your calculations? Since you're considering such a thick head gasket that leaves me to believe that you didn't. .080" is THICK and will result in a super wide quench - NOT good for power. Stock is .049". Most people go with a .028" gasket.

Also, for a street motor I would target something along the lines of 11.5:1 compression. Anything less and you're giving up free potential HP. There is no drawback in doing so.
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 04:25 PM
  #4  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,152
From: Woodstown, NJ
Re: LT1 383 build question

Originally Posted by Psycho
Just put premium in it and forget it. You will be good to go.
I am going to assume this is a joke.
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 04:29 PM
  #5  
rocknroler69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
Re: LT1 383 build question

would 11.5 be too high to run 93 though, by what ive gathered 11.5 is pushing it
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #6  
rocknroler69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
Re: LT1 383 build question

I also planned on using flat top pistons with 2 valve reliefs, =7.00cc. And i did factor in the cylinder bore which would be 4.030in. Deck i did not do
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 04:35 PM
  #7  
rocknroler69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
Re: LT1 383 build question

+7.00cc, my mistake
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 04:46 PM
  #8  
Psycho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 61
Re: LT1 383 build question

There is .31 c/r difference between the lowest and the highest configuration. Plus, small things like cleanup passes will change that. Whats the difference going to make? Differences in dyno hp? Back to back dyno runs have more error than the hp increase in .31 c/r.
Really. What's he going to use? Race gas?
I dunno, maybe I missed the point he was tring to make/ask.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
Feb 9, 2016 09:21 PM
Jrlt1
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Jan 3, 2015 07:38 PM
Queens94z28
Parts For Sale
3
Dec 20, 2014 09:11 PM
Injuneer
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Dec 15, 2014 09:36 AM
squirrels
Site Help and Suggestions
4
Jul 13, 2002 01:58 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 AM.