LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

loose or tight wich is better for performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2005, 11:46 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
92rslt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY Rochester
Posts: 447
loose or tight wich is better for performance

I was wondering is a loose motor or tight motor better for high performance? I think a loose would be because there more room for oil between the bearing. but then again theres more room for slop. hmm
92rslt1 is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 09:18 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
93LT1355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Posts: 305
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

looser clearences are better for performance
93LT1355 is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 10:48 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
blackztpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,810
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

Originally Posted by 93LT1355
looser clearences are better for performance
lol. you want your clearances as tight as possible for longevity. if you get them perfect and even all around, you will hold perfect oil pressure from new to 150,000 miles. looser clearances usually allow for more beating of the bearings, as it's more possible for the parts to actually move around in the bearings. if a stockish setup is revved to high, the crank can actually float off the bearing surface inbeteen shifts when there is no load on the crank.
in a general statement, you are correct, though. nhra uses clearances you wouldn't believe for less friction, but since you are probably not going to make it a 1/4 mile car only, you want to run the tightest clearances possible. typically a forged motor will have more clearance, but those clearances tighten once it's warm. forged expands more cast parts. a typical forged piston might see .005" piston to wall clearance, and a typical cast piston might see .0035" p to w clearance.
so, if you run forged, follow torque specs of a forged setup, but don't go setting huge clearances in anything for the sake of a little horsepower.
blackztpi is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 12:04 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
93LT1355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Posts: 305
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

Originally Posted by blackztpi
lol. you want your clearances as tight as possible for longevity. if you get them perfect and even all around, you will hold perfect oil pressure from new to 150,000 miles. looser clearances usually allow for more beating of the bearings, as it's more possible for the parts to actually move around in the bearings. if a stockish setup is revved to high, the crank can actually float off the bearing surface inbeteen shifts when there is no load on the crank.
in a general statement, you are correct, though. nhra uses clearances you wouldn't believe for less friction, but since you are probably not going to make it a 1/4 mile car only, you want to run the tightest clearances possible. typically a forged motor will have more clearance, but those clearances tighten once it's warm. forged expands more cast parts. a typical forged piston might see .005" piston to wall clearance, and a typical cast piston might see .0035" p to w clearance.
so, if you run forged, follow torque specs of a forged setup, but don't go setting huge clearances in anything for the sake of a little horsepower.
Most definatly, when I rebuilt my engine I took the time to measure out all the clearences to the specs given to me by my machine shop so I could build a strong motor that lasted. I was speaking in generality that looser clearences would give more horsepower because of less friction, but I would never advice putting an engine together loose to try to gain something. I would build to last.
93LT1355 is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 02:30 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
92rslt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY Rochester
Posts: 447
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

just what i thought. i agree to. but what weight oil are they using 20=50w? so you have more chance of spinning a main on a loose engine?
92rslt1 is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 02:56 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
"White Knight"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,544
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

Do you plan on rebuilding your motor a lot?
"White Knight" is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 03:02 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
92rslt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY Rochester
Posts: 447
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

nope. just wondering
92rslt1 is offline  
Old 09-03-2005, 01:12 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
93turbo5oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 690
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

Originally Posted by 92rslt1
just what i thought. i agree to. but what weight oil are they using 20=50w? so you have more chance of spinning a main on a loose engine?
most of the stock eliminator guys are running 0w10 redline race oil. their is an optimal clearence range for main/rod bearing. for oil flow rate at .015" clearence is approx 1/3 gal/min. at .020" that goes up to about 1/2 gal/min. at .025" it goes up to approx. 1 gal/min.

as far as bearing temp rise, at .030" you are looking at approx. a 5 degree rise, at .025" about 8 degrees, at .020 approx 10 degrees, at .015 about 18 degrees, at approx .010 it jumps to 38 degrees.

relative load capacity is much higher at .020 then .015". .025 is down a little from .020" but is still a lot higher then .015. .030 has about the same load capacity as .018" which are both still lower then .025".

set your main and rod clearances between .020-.025" and your engine will live a long and happy life.
93turbo5oh is offline  
Old 09-03-2005, 02:05 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
unTAmedLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Glenview,Illinois,USA
Posts: 713
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

mines setup loose but not super loose and thats for the juice
unTAmedLS1 is offline  
Old 09-03-2005, 02:11 AM
  #10  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

Originally Posted by 93turbo5oh
most of the stock eliminator guys are running 0w10 redline race oil. their is an optimal clearence range for main/rod bearing. for oil flow rate at .015" clearence is approx 1/3 gal/min. at .020" that goes up to about 1/2 gal/min. at .025" it goes up to approx. 1 gal/min.

as far as bearing temp rise, at .030" you are looking at approx. a 5 degree rise, at .025" about 8 degrees, at .020 approx 10 degrees, at .015 about 18 degrees, at approx .010 it jumps to 38 degrees.

relative load capacity is much higher at .020 then .015". .025 is down a little from .020" but is still a lot higher then .015. .030 has about the same load capacity as .018" which are both still lower then .025".

set your main and rod clearances between .020-.025" and your engine will live a long and happy life.

Good post...

As you can see guys a more is not better. The temps, oil and application all play a big part in it.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Old 09-03-2005, 08:16 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
OldSStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,931
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

Originally Posted by 93turbo5oh
most of the stock eliminator guys are running 0w10 redline race oil. their is an optimal clearence range for main/rod bearing. for oil flow rate at .015" clearence is approx 1/3 gal/min. at .020" that goes up to about 1/2 gal/min. at .025" it goes up to approx. 1 gal/min.

as far as bearing temp rise, at .030" you are looking at approx. a 5 degree rise, at .025" about 8 degrees, at .020 approx 10 degrees, at .015 about 18 degrees, at approx .010 it jumps to 38 degrees.

relative load capacity is much higher at .020 then .015". .025 is down a little from .020" but is still a lot higher then .015. .030 has about the same load capacity as .018" which are both still lower then .025".

set your main and rod clearances between .020-.025" and your engine will live a long and happy life.
If you are talking bearing-to-journal clearances, didn't you misplace the decimal point by one place? Shouldn't the numbers be .0015; .0018; .0025; .0030 ?
OldSStroker is offline  
Old 09-03-2005, 11:06 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
93turbo5oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 690
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

Originally Posted by OldSStroker
If you are talking bearing-to-journal clearances, didn't you misplace the decimal point by one place? Shouldn't the numbers be .0015; .0018; .0025; .0030 ?

it was late, i worked a 14 hours and i was tired. what can i say?
93turbo5oh is offline  
Old 09-03-2005, 12:26 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
slimdawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Bern, NC USA
Posts: 1,234
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

Do you mean bearing clearance only? What about rings? Are you gong to spray?
slimdawson is offline  
Old 09-03-2005, 12:39 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
93turbo5oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 690
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

piston to wall clearences are going to depend not only on if its going to have a poweradder or not, but will also vary greatly depending on the alloy of the piston. we look for 2-3% leakdown when hot. the stock eliminator guys basically build a wornout shortblock with exceptional ring seal.
93turbo5oh is offline  
Old 09-03-2005, 08:51 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
92rslt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY Rochester
Posts: 447
Re: loose or tight wich is better for performance

so the tighter the hotter the more chance of spinning mains? or am i understanding it backwards.
92rslt1 is offline  


Quick Reply: loose or tight wich is better for performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.