LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Lobe Seperation ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 05:10 PM
  #1  
UNV MI Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 111
From: Columbus, OH USA
Lobe Seperation ??

383 is being built as we speak. Forged everything, ported heads, etc.. Question is - I bought a Comp Cams Xtreme Energy cam, it's a 236/242. I haven't looked for sure yet, but I think it's has a 110 lobe seperation. I am just wondering how this will effect me. Will this not work with my setup?? Camshaft details are the only thing about a motor that I really don't understand. So all your help is appreciated. Details are 383, forged parts, ported heads with dual valvesprings, 1.6 rockers, etc.., you get the picture. Just unsure about the cam. Also, are titanium retainers a must with this cam?? Thanks in advance for the help.

Seth
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #2  
shocktrp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 170
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Stock LSA is 117
Hotcam LSA is 112

You should have a little more lope than the Hotcam, but it should be fine with PCM programming.
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 05:30 PM
  #3  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,152
From: Woodstown, NJ
Your manifold vacuum may be uncomfortably low for power brakes. You might want to consider a seperate vacuum canister. You'd benefit alot, considering at stock idle rpms, you'll stall out. Have your idle raised to 1000rpm with that kind of bumpstick.
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 05:49 PM
  #4  
UNV MI Z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 111
From: Columbus, OH USA
Thanks for the replies. So the only thing I might lose is some vacuum?? If I went with the same cam but with a 112 lobe seperation would I still have this problem. Just trying to figure out if I need to switch to the 112 or not. Also, do I need titanium retainers with this cam??
thanks
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 06:53 PM
  #5  
shocktrp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 170
From: Long Island, NY, USA
My brakes feel the same with the Hotcam as they did with the stocker.
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 07:56 PM
  #6  
97Z-M6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,058
From: near waco tx.
Originally posted by shocktrp
My brakes feel the same with the Hotcam as they did with the stocker.
but the 236/242 makes the hotcam look very small. with the lsa of 110 and 236/242 duration the overlap is more than if it were on a 112. and overlap really affects the drivability. but the the added cubic inches will tame it out a little

Last edited by 97Z-M6; Feb 19, 2003 at 07:59 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
5
Oct 16, 2015 12:24 PM
oil pan 4
V6 Tech
4
Nov 9, 2002 07:27 PM
qukz28
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
6
Oct 27, 2002 01:31 AM
Blown350Camaro
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
2
Oct 24, 2002 10:59 PM
70 Cam Guy
Classic Engine Tech
4
Aug 26, 2002 08:43 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.