LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Initial Mid-Lift Rocker Height Measurements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #16  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Mike, without having to read all 200+ replies of the other threads, why are you going through all this. Is it due to a valve length issue, getting your heads decked, or is it just the new cam?

I'm curious if this is as big of an issue if I were just to install the 227, or GM845 with stock heads, and keep 7.2" stock length pushrods. (I have 7/16" 4501-16 Comp studs, and 1.6 NSA Pro Mags right now)

Dan
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 12:10 AM
  #17  
truedualws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,406
From: Downey, CA
Originally Posted by stereomandan
Mike, without having to read all 200+ replies of the other threads, why are you going through all this. Is it due to a valve length issue, getting your heads decked, or is it just the new cam?

I'm curious if this is as big of an issue if I were just to install the 227, or GM845 with stock heads, and keep 7.2" stock length pushrods. (I have 7/16" 4501-16 Comp studs, and 1.6 NSA Pro Mags right now)

Dan
The one thing that all this extra analysis for the mid-lift approach shows is that you can't really
go wrong with 7.20" pushrods, even with milled heads and longer valves. I just ordered 7.30"
pushrods and will give them a try but for most this exercise is not necessary. For the big
HP motors and that last .0x second at the track it's important, but not for a daily driver. I'm just
a bit to AR about the whole thing and had to see it through.

What made the whole effort worth while for me was reviewing the pictures and seeing the
difference in the rockers. Without the side by side comparison you would think centering the roller
pattern on the valve tip is the way to go. The pictures show just how far off things get when you
shorten pushrods instead of minimizing the width of the roller contact pattern.

You will be just fine with 7.20" pushrods.
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 12:16 AM
  #18  
truedualws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,406
From: Downey, CA
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
I figured you would have something figured out, mostly wanted it noted so sombody else didn't go and try and use a cheap washer that you can see the taper on.
The one thing that I need to do that I prefer not to is put the washer below the guideplate.
With the ARP washer it should not be an issue. The reason is that the ARP rocker studs that I
have are the ones with the shank under the hex to locate the guideplates and the .438" ID
washers will not work on top. I'm sure it will be fine.

The other dimension to watch out for is the OD of the washer so that it clears the head bolts.
It looks like .75" is the maximun OD that will work.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
13qtr
Parts For Sale
24
Oct 28, 2016 08:11 PM
9t4lt4z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Oct 2, 2015 10:28 AM
Bigtoyz97
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
0
Sep 21, 2015 01:44 PM
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2015 03:39 PM
damnyankee36
LS1 Based Engine Tech
5
Sep 9, 2015 07:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.