LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Idles perfect in open loop, but rough in closed.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 01:03 PM
  #1  
JAFO1994's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 192
From: Oshkosh, WI., United States
Idles perfect in open loop, but rough in closed.

Anybody with some expert advice please. I've been trying to solve this rough idle when in gear problem. In open loop it idles as smooth as silk and when you first start it up after it's warmed up for the first few minutes is perfect too. I believe the car will always start in open loop for like 3 minutes even warm, before going to closed loop. As soon as closed loop hits, it idles rough in gear. Car idles at 550 in gear. Tach needle doesn't move and I don't think it's a miss. The following is all new: wires, plugs, coil, PVC, MAP, TPS, O2's, cleaned IAC and checked. Vacuum leaks checked and none. TB and intake has been cleaned. It did it before the headers were installed also, so I think I can eliminate exhaust leaks. I'm down to thinking it's because of the ported MAF or original opti. I don't think opti because it's fine in open loop. Putting the screen back in the MAF didn't change anything either. Other than the idle the car runs flawless with no hesitations. Any other suggestions to check on?
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 01:10 PM
  #2  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
I would say try to borrow someone's MAF and see if it idles better.
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 01:13 PM
  #3  
JAFO1994's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 192
From: Oshkosh, WI., United States
Not really an option for me since I just moved to the area and don't know anyone. Can I unplug my MAF when it's in closed loop? Will it go into speed density mode and check that way or will it run like crap and throw codes?
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 01:19 PM
  #4  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Well it might throw a code for your MAF but yes you would go into open loop and it shouldn't have a rough idle.

Some parts stores let you buy the part and if it turns out that wasn't what was wrong they let you return it as long as you do it within a couple of hours.
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:14 PM
  #5  
leadfoot94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 595
From: Michigan
My car did the same thing, and we figured out it was the Opti. It would start up and run just fine in open loop, then once it hit the Closed it started to hesitate, and sputter.
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:16 PM
  #6  
leadfoot94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 595
From: Michigan
Scan it and see if it throws any codes. Then you'll have an idea.
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:17 PM
  #7  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
I guess I need an elementary lesson on open-loop, closed loop. My understanding is that the ECM is in closed-loop at idle and open loop when pedal to the metal. I.e, the ECM tries to maintain optimum A/F in closed loop but in open loop the maping takes over and along with the throttle position and 02s the ECM provides optimum A/F based on conditions.

I'm hearing you say that its in open loop when you start it up. Probably a misunderstanding on my part.

I will say that when I first had my A/F optimized by Ed for my small cam everything was fine, but I did realize a bit better idle with PCMFORLESS when I had the heads done and Brian did some A/F tuning for the idling as well.

It seems to idle a bit nicer since Brian did some programming for idle as well as WOT.

So someone please set me straight on the closed loop vs open loop condition.

Thx.
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:30 PM
  #8  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
open loop on start up and at WOT

closed loop during normal driving

that was my understanding
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:49 PM
  #9  
Momar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 274
From: Decatur
Open loop it is running off of some basic sensors and the tables. Closed loop requires your oxygen sensors to have heated up. Once they are heated and you go into closed loop the computer trys to compensate for the a/f ratio. WOT is also open loop. It stops reading the O2 at WOT. This is why dyno tuning for WOT is so helpfull.


Ben
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:55 PM
  #10  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
Yea. I guess it would be in Open Loop on start up until the 02s had a chance to warm up. Seems though that as soon as the 02 warmed up and the ECM went into closed loop (for idling and normal cruising) that either the 02s need some work, or the ECM needs some A/F programing for closed-loop operation to maintain a smooth idle.

I obviously don't know what I'm talking about, but...
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 04:01 PM
  #11  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
Could the ported MAF have anything to do with it?

It's obviously not calibrated and may not work optimally with prgramming.

Hell, I don;t know. Good luck, and tell us what you find out.
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 04:05 PM
  #12  
FastGuyJR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 127
From: Newark, DE
Have you tried using a scan tool? It sounds like your O2 sensors might be fouled. I see you have replaced them, but you need to check the mV readings to see that they are operating correctly. If one bank looks different than the other, check for burnt plug wires first (common when installing headers), then swap out that particular O2 sensor. Hope this helps.

JR
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 04:24 PM
  #13  
Momar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 274
From: Decatur
Well, I just reread what Vizard said, and he says that the overlap stuff doesnt work on the street. He did say that on race motors with enough overlap that the exhaust scavenging during overlap(while both valves are open) pulls more intake air into the cylinder. He said that on the budget motor that he was using as an example it exerted what would be equal to 1 psi of force on the intake air, but in winston cup motors it exerts what would equal to 6 or 7 psi. He says "In practice, then, the exhaust phenomena makes a race engine a five-cycle engine with two consecutive induction events."

He also states that you can get a wider powerband with the correct exhaust diameter. I dont know the 3" collector with the reducer effects all of this though.

Ben
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 04:32 PM
  #14  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
Say what?
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 05:58 PM
  #15  
Momar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 274
From: Decatur
Originally posted by BUBBA
Say what?
It doesnt matter. Other than the fact that I still dont believe that all motors need dual 3" pipe or could all benifit from it, the rest of it just applies to racing motors for the most part. If I would have realized that before I posted it I wouldnt have bothered.

Ben



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.