I have the money to order a cam kit. I'd like a cam that I can run well with my 3.42's. I would like to trap over at least 110-111mph on my stock heads for the meantime. Something with midrange and topend power. Something I dont have to rev over 6400rpms. Oh.......and 1,000,000 would do also Thanks for any help on making my decision. Post which cam you would get if you were me.

 

What XE cam is the equivilent to the cc305?

 

i would go with the 230/236 if you want a 110 traps without heads. The only cam close to the 305 would be the XE224/230.

 

cc305...if your car is an M6. you'll also need LT's, injectors, all the bolt-ons, some good tuning, and some crappy 60 ft. times.

 

Drop some weight and save the trouble of putting a cam in.. btw nice dyno #'s

 

There are 3 different types of 224/230's avaliable, one has 111lsa & the other has more lift but 112lsa like the first one

 

a CC305 and some weight loss will do it ...

a 230 / 236 XE is a VERY nice cam too ...
i trapped 110 .. on a 13.0 run with my CC305 and stock heads back in the day .. at FULL weight .. drop a 100 lbs and u'l be trapping 112 ish

 

I do it on a hotcam and street tires, N/A, with the mods I have in the sig and no weight reduction. But I have a M6. My torque arm broke on the 110 MPH run and chewed up my DS.

Jeff

 

we've trapped 112.8 at full weight with the 305, bolt-ons and major traction issues.

 

I trapped 109 mph with a cc305, 1.6 rr's, RK Sport headers, and other bolt-ons. This was on a 150 000 mile engine.

with longtubes and a 230/236 you should have no problem cracking 110 mph.