Which head would be better?
Which head would be better?
.100 .200 .300 .400 .500 .600 .700
67/64 119/112 177/153 226/188 265/207 281/217 285/220
0.500 34 26
0.100 70 56
0.150 106 80
0.200 142 106
0.250 174 129
0.300 202 149
0.350 225 165
0.400 244 180
0.450 258 193
0.500 267 202
0.550 275 210
0.600 277 216
0.650 283 222
0.700 286 227
0.750 286 230
Both heads are 215 cc intake runner and 85 cc exaust runner
Which flow numbers would you want have and why, the 1st or 2nd? Going into LT1 383 10:1 compression, 246/246 112 ls .600 lift cam, 200 shot. The 1st has better flow at .600 and the 2nd is right behind it there. The 2nd has better flow rates between .100 and .500. Does it really matter to have good flow at your max lift of your cam is it better to have better flow under .500 lift?
67/64 119/112 177/153 226/188 265/207 281/217 285/220
0.500 34 26
0.100 70 56
0.150 106 80
0.200 142 106
0.250 174 129
0.300 202 149
0.350 225 165
0.400 244 180
0.450 258 193
0.500 267 202
0.550 275 210
0.600 277 216
0.650 283 222
0.700 286 227
0.750 286 230
Both heads are 215 cc intake runner and 85 cc exaust runner
Which flow numbers would you want have and why, the 1st or 2nd? Going into LT1 383 10:1 compression, 246/246 112 ls .600 lift cam, 200 shot. The 1st has better flow at .600 and the 2nd is right behind it there. The 2nd has better flow rates between .100 and .500. Does it really matter to have good flow at your max lift of your cam is it better to have better flow under .500 lift?
Last edited by Red_94Formula; Nov 1, 2004 at 07:19 PM. Reason: forgot stuff
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Victor Lamb
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
3
Aug 26, 2017 02:52 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM



