LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Gtech my car today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 10:33 PM
  #1  
redfirehawk101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54
From: Nebraska
Gtech my car today

I got a chance to run my car today after the tranny rebuilt, shift kit, and new torque converter. I also had new plugs and wires put in along with a fuel filter. I don't know how accurate these gtechs are but I ran a 12.6 at 119 mph

0-60 4.5 seconds 2.5 60ft
1/8th 8.51 at 94mph
1/4th mile 12.6 at 119mph
HP 346
TQ 402

Has anyone else questioned the use of these?

I was shocked after my run today to find out what it showed.
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #2  
30AnniversaryZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 284
From: Charleston, SC
I can't really see how a 2.5 60' equates to a 12.6
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #3  
redfirehawk101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54
From: Nebraska
Gtech my car today

I don't see how a 2.5 60 ft could equal a 12.6 either but that is what the gtech showed. I did have some tire spin off the line. This was on street tires too.
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 10:46 PM
  #4  
JD311's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 80
Did you use it on a fairly straight road? It wasnt bumpy was it? That kind of stuff throws all of the "G" meters off. I have an older Gtech and a newer style with more features (another brand cant remember right now) I used both and on the right road they can be fairly accurate. But I have had them show inaccurate times as well so watch out. I ran pretty close to the same thing at the track when I first got my car. Haven't been back to the track yet since mods only Gtech. A4 trans is toast, destroyed the sprag.
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #5  
redfirehawk101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54
From: Nebraska
Gtech my car today

The road was flat and not bumpy. A smooth highway as a matter of fact. Prior to the tuneup, tranny rebuilt, and new torque converter. I only ran 13's with a gtech. On my last attempt, I shattered the input drum in the tranny. It cost me around 1500 bucks for labor and parts to get it to where it is now.
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 12:19 AM
  #6  
MarcR94v6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: San Diego, CA
I'm guessing the gtech is giving you flywheel hp numbers?
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 12:57 AM
  #7  
redfirehawk101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54
From: Nebraska
Gtech my car today

Actually according to the gtech manual,it is rear wheel less airodynamic drag on the car.
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 12:58 AM
  #8  
rock1501's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 838
From: ajax ontario canada
there is no way in hell you can trap 119 mph with those mods
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 01:05 AM
  #9  
mad95z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 177
From: Coon Rapids
G-techs can be accurite, sometimes.

I agree, the 119 mph is several mph off.
the 12.6 seems pretty quick for 315 HP.

Last edited by mad95z; Sep 11, 2008 at 01:08 AM.
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 01:12 AM
  #10  
redfirehawk101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54
From: Nebraska
Gtech my car today

Your probably right about the trap speed being too high. I have read in different forums that the trap speed tends to be high on the gtech until you can get an accurate pitch factor set. I guess I would actually have to take it to the track and compare the gtech and actual track times. 110 seems more logical for a trap speed.
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 01:21 AM
  #11  
redfirehawk101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 54
From: Nebraska
Gtech my car today

The 315hp is what they came stock with in 95. When I bought the car I added the mods in my sig. I also gutted the cat, I am not sure about internals done to the car since I am the second owner. I bought from a dealer and had no way of getting ahold of previous owner to see if internals were messed with.
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 09:17 AM
  #12  
MarcR94v6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: San Diego, CA
I would say your internals would have to be messed with to go from the rated 315 flywheel hp to 346/402 to the wheels with your mods. That, or more likely, the Gtech is inaccurate in getting power numbers.
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 09:49 AM
  #13  
slomarao's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
The trap and tq are the biggest things that are off. Everything else is semi believeable.
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #14  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
ET's are usually close. Trap speed is always high.
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #15  
Sparkz28ss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 977
From: ..behind you with a butter knife
119mph trap....lol.....ssuuuuuure



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM.