LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

GMHTP 396 Article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2006, 06:30 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Shon Herron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Six Mile, SC, USA
Posts: 2,054
GMHTP 396 Article

How does a 500+ FWHP 396CI only make 396RWHP?
I know it is thru an A4 with a 3000 stall but come on, we know that the losss is not 25% as stated in the article.

Something is not adding up for me. There seemed to be several excuses and I hope they follow up with alot better numbers b/c from the engine dyno I was expecting in the lower 400s. Are my expectations too high?
Shon Herron is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 10:01 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
roadtrip120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Amarillo Texas
Posts: 712
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

Ya that was pretty bad, Why would you need a 396 when a LE2 setup on a stock bottom end puts down more power to the wheels. GMHTP messed that one up, come feature my car at least it made more hp.

What up Shon, hows the car?
roadtrip120 is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 11:22 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Shon Herron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Six Mile, SC, USA
Posts: 2,054
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

Originally Posted by roadtrip120
Ya that was pretty bad, Why would you need a 396 when a LE2 setup on a stock bottom end puts down more power to the wheels. GMHTP messed that one up, come feature my car at least it made more hp.

What up Shon, hows the car?
We should be able to put a 355 set up in the car with a truely high stall thru a 12bolt/Th350 and slicks and come up with more power. I hope to know within 6 weeks or so
Shon Herron is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 12:16 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

I always looked at the drivetrain losses the other way 500fwhp minus 20% woulf be 400rwhp, the car places restrictions on the intake and exhaust not to mention accessories and all there is more loss than just tranny and axle.

That said since when have the car mags been able to write anything worthwhile?
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 12:18 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
89TramsAmGTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 454
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

I agree. That's 20% in my book.
89TramsAmGTA is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 01:06 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
MEAN LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jacksonville,fla
Posts: 1,983
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

It had better perform at the 1320.
MEAN LT1 is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 01:16 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Pacific North West
Posts: 1,431
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

I bet the power under the curve is better then a 355

Power Under the curve is where its at not peak numbers!
OneFlyn95z28 is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 02:50 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
LT4POWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 586
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

I think they spec'd the motor to be Smog Legal and daily driveable too.
LT4POWR is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 03:23 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Shon Herron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Six Mile, SC, USA
Posts: 2,054
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

Originally Posted by OneFlyn95z28
I bet the power under the curve is better then a 355

Power Under the curve is where its at not peak numbers!
Where it is at is the MPH at the track, wonder if it will ever be there? If so, bet it wont trap much more that 118ish....
Shon Herron is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 05:44 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

Ya KNOW everybody takes as gospel that these mag's and some people know how to make HP. Ya are seeing it here as this one DID NOT.They said it had a fuel pump problem with the stock pump!!!!!!
A 396 LT1 built right should make 700+FWHP and be street drivable not a DD, so IMO this one is 200FWHP light. I have built 406SBC that are in the 800+ range with a single carb and there ain't much difference in a 396-406=10CI's.These were street drivable but were a "little" high strung for a DD.
Every body should have one like the one in the article.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 06:40 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
My Iroc Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 739
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

I Spoked to Chad about that motor and its rwhp numbers since i was going to have him build me a 396 shortblock, he said after the fuel pump swap and some more tuning from bryan @ Pcmforless the car put down 430rwhp/418rwtq. He didn't know if they were going to run a update article in the mag or not, He also says the car is a nice DD & he enjoys driving it.
My Iroc Z28 is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 06:49 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
1racerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LA (lower Alabama)
Posts: 6,661
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

That's 507FWHP but a 396 would be hell on fuel mileage as a DD. Must have small heads and cam too.
1racerdude is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 06:55 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
My Iroc Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 739
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

well they only list it as 520bhp. what i didn't understand is the valvetrain setup uses 1.6 on the intake and 1.5 on the exhaust.. why not 1.6's all the way around??.. He didn't get into the head specs besides there stock ported heads and the springs are 918's... The intake is ported to match the heads and opened up for a 58mm tb

I think with some well ported AFR's or Trickflows with bigger valves and runners along with a matching cam and intake manifold a 396 could see 500rwhp N/A but that would most likly rise the cost of the motor and make it less affordable for people.

Heres the specs of the motor listed on there site

Duration:
Intake: 236˚@ .050”
Exhaust: 244˚@ .050”

Lift:
Intake: .585”
Exhaust: .580”

Lobe Separation:
112˚

Heads:

Type:
Trick flow 195cc LT4 Aluminum Stage 2 Porting, Five Angle Performance Valve Job

Combustion Chamber:
64cc

Intake Runner:
195 cc

Intake Valves:
Stainless Steel 2.02”

Exhaust Valves:
Stainless Steel 1.60

Last edited by My Iroc Z28; 08-06-2006 at 07:00 PM.
My Iroc Z28 is offline  
Old 08-06-2006, 08:49 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
SS RRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Jackstandican
Posts: 3,144
Re: GMHTP 396 Article

Originally Posted by roadtrip120
Why would you need a 396 when a LE2 setup on a stock bottom end puts down more power to the wheels.
For the torque.
Originally Posted by My Iroc Z28
Duration:
Intake: 236˚@ .050”
Exhaust: 244˚@ .050”
Intake: .585”
Exhaust: .580
That is a teeeennnnnny cam for a 396! What...are they trying to make it emissions legal or something?
SS RRR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
11-15-2015 08:24 AM
mark0006
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-14-2015 12:35 PM
mark0006
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
08-29-2015 09:45 AM
cmsmith
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
08-25-2015 09:42 AM
mark0006
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
1
08-22-2015 07:23 PM



Quick Reply: GMHTP 396 Article



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM.