LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Gear choice for auto: once and for all, 3.42 vs 3.73

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 07:11 PM
  #1  
Blue96z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 709
From: Oklahoma
Gear choice for auto: once and for all, 3.42 vs 3.73

I'am sorry to bring this up again, I've read all the threads, but can't get an accurate answer. I'am trying to deside between either 3.42's or 3.73's, anything else is either too big for sure or to small, and I have 2.73's right now. All I want to know is people w/auto's rpm at 65ish w/either 3.42 or 3.73's????? Right now my RPM is 1800 exactly at 65mph, just need an exact answer, that online gear calc. thing is wrong, I put my car in gears in there and it was 200rpm off. Also anyone with gear swicthes from 2.73 to either of the two you opinions would be great. I really want to know if 3.42's are even a noticeable difference over the 2.73s(which suck by the way, ).

Thanks in advance for all your help.
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 07:14 PM
  #2  
1msfyter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,194
From: Austin texas
3.42 is my vote

use this: http://www.f-body.org/gears/
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 07:44 PM
  #3  
cd520's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 47
From: WV
3.42's get my vote too if its street driven a lot. I went with 3.42's and I'm glad I didn't go any higher because I drive on the highway 75% of the time. I'm not really sure what I tach at 65mph. At 80mph I tach about 2500rpm.
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 07:49 PM
  #4  
Derrick Redd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: Gretna, LA
I went from 2.73's to 3.42's. It's a definite improvement. IMO I'd go with 3.73's if your keeping your car NA, or 3.42's if a power adder is in your future. Also I'd go with 3.42's if the car is your daily driver, or you drive alot on the highway. Overall I like the 3.42's in my car, but I'd go 3.73 for a max effort NA car.

Last edited by Derrick Redd; Aug 22, 2003 at 08:00 PM.
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 07:49 PM
  #5  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 609
From: Quad Cities
Originally posted by cd520
3.42's get my vote too if its street driven a lot. I went with 3.42's and I'm glad I didn't go any higher because I drive on the highway 75% of the time. I'm not really sure what I tach at 65mph. At 80mph I tach about 2500rpm.
Dead on..at 65mph you should tach ~2050rpm

I love these gears. Good pull in triple digits.. .decent street performance (Light to light) and I can still roll the interstates without sucking down the gas. Love them.
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 07:52 PM
  #6  
cd520's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 47
From: WV
Yep, I just used the calculator and it shows exactly what I tach at 80mph even with the old 3rd gen tach.
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 08:08 PM
  #7  
Dave Feerst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 641
From: St. Charles, Il
my calc shows 1920 with 3:42s and 2094 with 3:73s ant that is showing 1600 with 2:73s. but your stock tach reads 100-200 high, Just today i make about 10 WOT runs as we were tuning my car and the tach reached 6500 on the 1/2 shift every time yet the computer said the highest rpm it reached was 629X every time.
The computer is right, the tach is off.

As for which to chose... to any car running 11s or higher i say 3:73s. you start going down when you get into the 10s and run out of greas in the 1/4.
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #8  
Derrick Redd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: Gretna, LA
Originally posted by Dave Feerst
As for which to chose... to any car running 11s or higher i say 3:73s. you start going down when you get into the 10s and run out of greas in the 1/4.
Exactly.
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 08:17 PM
  #9  
BlakeW5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 478
From: Hodgenville, Kentucky
I like my 3.42. Can't tell you what the difference would feel like though, they were on when I got my car. IMO I would go with the 3.73. From what I've heard on the board, gas mileage shouldn't be affected that much.
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 08:25 PM
  #10  
96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,967
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
I have a stick but I can positively tell you that the stock tach is WAY off. I have an autometer tach that is a lot more accurate and if you have freescan it is accurate to the nearest 25 rpm dead on.
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 11:39 PM
  #11  
Got-LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 811
From: tallahassee, FL
I goota say to go with 3.73s, they're not too bad on gas, and the car is daily driven.
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 01:34 AM
  #12  
Blue96z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 709
From: Oklahoma
The car will definetely be daily driven. I guess the fbody gear calc is accurate, I was assuming that the stock tach was correct, but i guess its not, according to it, its a 400rom jump at 65 for 3.42's but only a 600rpm jump for 3.73's, so im thinking that the 3.73's should be that awfully to big, gas mlg is a for sure a problem if its bad...as im a ***** lol. Anybody with mileage number for either a 3.42 car or 3.73 car w/an auto would be great????
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 06:12 AM
  #13  
dadsgreen95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15
From: Wilmington,NC
I usually get about 21 mpg, mix of city/ highway.
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 08:18 PM
  #14  
2cub49's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 700
From: Upstate New York
I went from 2.73 to 3.42 then to 3.73. I'd go with the 3.73's as the car really wants to accelerate and the gears are quicker and crisper. With the A4 shifting at WOT the 1-2 shift is 3000 rpm and the car just goes. The 3.42 was more labored with the shift being at a lower rpm. I do a lot of highway cruising so I had the BF Goodrich Radial TA 265/50/16's put on the car. They're an inch taller than stock and give 5mph more per given rpm or 200 rpm less per given speed. These tires are only S (112 mph) rated but really how often do we go faster than that for any length of time. Overall a good combination if you like cruising at 90 (3200 rpm) yet want great 1st gear.
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #15  
pennys58's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 869
From: Houston, TX
I've got 3.23's now, and I'm thinking of getting some new gears too. I'll have hotcam, ported heads by lloyd, 52mm tb, hooker LT's with custom 3" exhaust. Do you think 3.73's would be fine or just go with 3.42's. Thanks.
JOHN



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.