LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

fbody vs. b-body stock cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2007, 09:09 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
reamo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,706
fbody vs. b-body stock cams?

do the b-body's come with a different cam than f-bodys?
I just put a LT1 from a caprice into my car, and it feels like it has more low-end
reamo04 is offline  
Old 05-06-2007, 09:23 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 747
Originally Posted by reamo04
do the b-body's come with a different cam than f-bodys?
I just put a LT1 from a caprice into my car, and it feels like it has more low-end
Yep, the cams geared more for lowend torque to move the heavier b-body. It likely also is producing a little less horsepower as well.
LiENUS is offline  
Old 05-06-2007, 09:33 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
reamo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,706
alright, i was wondering
I had a dif. cam in my fbody motor than stock (not entirely sureon specs of it) and this one just feels like it has a lot more low end
reamo04 is offline  
Old 05-06-2007, 09:42 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Have to consider that the b-body had grandpa quiet intake and exhaust as well as 87 octane tuning. People who want to talk up the "less hp" aspect of this seem to forget these details. Both well tuned with comparable boltons make very close to the same power.

I honestly wonder if what really happened was GM limited lowend on the f-body to save the glass axle. The LT1 b-bodies got the 8.5" which is pretty stout.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 08:44 AM
  #5  
West South Central Moderator
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kilgore TX 75662
Posts: 3,372
depending on your source, the B-LT1 cam is more than 10 degrees shorter @.050 than the F-LT1 cam. But it is also much tighter LSA at 111 instead of 116 or so.
AdioSS is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:44 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 747
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Have to consider that the b-body had grandpa quiet intake and exhaust as well as 87 octane tuning. People who want to talk up the "less hp" aspect of this seem to forget these details. Both well tuned with comparable boltons make very close to the same power.

I honestly wonder if what really happened was GM limited lowend on the f-body to save the glass axle. The LT1 b-bodies got the 8.5" which is pretty stout.
The plastic portion of the intake tract does not account for very much horsepower loss, they both share the same intake manifolds and exhaust manifolds. The B-body lt1 makes less horsepower because it has a smaller cam and lower compression. the "87 octane tuning" is on the f-body lt1s as well so thats not a very good excuse to use.
LiENUS is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 02:45 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
reamo04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,706
Originally Posted by LiENUS
The plastic portion of the intake tract does not account for very much horsepower loss, they both share the same intake manifolds and exhaust manifolds. The B-body lt1 makes less horsepower because it has a smaller cam and lower compression. the "87 octane tuning" is on the f-body lt1s as well so thats not a very good excuse to use.
will there be a difference in compression since i used my fbody heads? I had the 643 castings on it right now, and it doesnt really feel like it has less top end or anything, feels the same except with more low-end
reamo04 is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 03:55 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
I was not refering to the manifolds atall but rather the airbox and noise baffles.

The b-body did get dual cats and mufflers but the pipes are SEVERLY crush bent and the mufflers are 1 3/4" inside.
Bolton b-bodies, done well, can be 300rwhp are you seriously claiming much more for f-bodies? Keep in mind all b-bodies were A4 and all LT1 b-bodies got the 8.5" axle.

Far as the 87 octane tuning best I know the f-bodies got 91 octane recommended. What do I know though I am just capable of research and thought, lost skills these days.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 07:41 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 747
Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
I was not refering to the manifolds atall but rather the airbox and noise baffles.

The b-body did get dual cats and mufflers but the pipes are SEVERLY crush bent and the mufflers are 1 3/4" inside.
Bolton b-bodies, done well, can be 300rwhp are you seriously claiming much more for f-bodies? Keep in mind all b-bodies were A4 and all LT1 b-bodies got the 8.5" axle.
Far as the 87 octane tuning best I know the f-bodies got 91 octane recommended. What do I know though I am just capable of research and thought, lost skills these days.
They run just fine on 87 octane, I had to run 87 during the katrina aftermath because it was all there was, and it worked fine. Theres not a huge difference restriction between the b-body and f-body airboxes as far as I've seen. The big differences come in lower compression and a smaller camshaft. Run the same camshaft in a b-body and f-body engine (with their respective stock heads) and you will see similar power peaks, yes without boltons the b-body will be a little more restricted but the difference won't be huge.

Originally Posted by reamo04
will there be a difference in compression since i used my fbody heads? I had the 643 castings on it right now, and it doesnt really feel like it has less top end or anything, feels the same except with more low-end
Compression should be the same if you're running f-body heads, the change in top-end isn't much but it is there.
LiENUS is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 07:48 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 3,245
Originally Posted by LiENUS
They run just fine on 87 octane, I had to run 87 during the katrina aftermath because it was all there was, and it worked fine. Theres not a huge difference restriction between the b-body and f-body airboxes as far as I've seen. The big differences come in lower compression and a smaller camshaft. Run the same camshaft in a b-body and f-body engine (with their respective stock heads) and you will see similar power peaks, yes without boltons the b-body will be a little more restricted but the difference won't be huge.



Compression should be the same if you're running f-body heads, the change in top-end isn't much but it is there.
That's because f-bodys also have a low octaing timing table that it goes to when it gets alot of constant knock retard.
speed_demon24 is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 10:01 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
LiENUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 747
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
That's because f-bodys also have a low octaing timing table that it goes to when it gets alot of constant knock retard.
Point being, they have an 87 octane tune, and when I was running 87 octane I couldn't tell any performance difference.
LiENUS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HectorM52
Parts For Sale
26
07-30-2017 11:46 AM
canbaufo
Parts For Sale
7
05-25-2015 12:01 PM
Noer
Parts For Sale
4
02-28-2015 11:29 AM
blac94Z
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
02-18-2015 11:36 AM
InfernalVortex
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
01-17-2015 09:35 AM



Quick Reply: fbody vs. b-body stock cams?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM.