DYNO #'s where should i be at?
Sorry, but I'm thinking 271rwHP and 292rwTQ on a Mustang Dyno.
Flywheel: 325/350
Got to take that stall into consideration. The only power I see would be from the headers/exhaust and CAI.
Let us know, Goodluck and I hope you prove me wrong
Flywheel: 325/350
Got to take that stall into consideration. The only power I see would be from the headers/exhaust and CAI.
Let us know, Goodluck and I hope you prove me wrong
Well, last time I guessed low, so this time I might be a little high, but here's how I break it down.
Stock LT1 A4: 245 rwhp
Headers and catback: +30
CAI +5-7
MAF +2-3
I'm optimistic, and said 290. (On a dynojet)
More realistic may be 275-285.
The stall will hurt, but I'm not sure how much.
Dan
Stock LT1 A4: 245 rwhp
Headers and catback: +30
CAI +5-7
MAF +2-3
I'm optimistic, and said 290. (On a dynojet)
More realistic may be 275-285.
The stall will hurt, but I'm not sure how much.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; Apr 15, 2004 at 10:46 PM.
290 rwhp on a dynojet if your opti and fuel system are in good condition.
jeeze guys, i pulled down 277rwhp sae BEFORE I put on headers and a catback.
Next recomended mod: PCMforLeSS or MadZ28 mailorder tune.
-brent
Edit* oops, i bumped it down for the A4, my bad
jeeze guys, i pulled down 277rwhp sae BEFORE I put on headers and a catback.
Next recomended mod: PCMforLeSS or MadZ28 mailorder tune.
-brent
Edit* oops, i bumped it down for the A4, my bad
Last edited by 94formulabz; Apr 15, 2004 at 11:06 PM.
Originally posted by 94formulabz
jeeze guys, i pulled down 277rwhp sae BEFORE I put on headers and a catback.
-brent
Edit* oops, i bumped it down for the A4, my bad
jeeze guys, i pulled down 277rwhp sae BEFORE I put on headers and a catback.
-brent
Edit* oops, i bumped it down for the A4, my bad
Sorry, I missed the part where he said he'd be going to a mustang dyno
Are dynojet's not more common? I'm familiar with the mustang's lower numbers. However, I've seen people get "dynojet equivilent" numbers off of a mustang. All depends on the rates the operator sets up. Check out a post below yours. I guess i should have said 'jeeze guy'
-brent
Are dynojet's not more common? I'm familiar with the mustang's lower numbers. However, I've seen people get "dynojet equivilent" numbers off of a mustang. All depends on the rates the operator sets up. Check out a post below yours. I guess i should have said 'jeeze guy'
-brent
Originally posted by 94formulabz
Is norwalk uphill? Whats up with only trapping 106 when you have 320 "real horsepower"? did you do mods inbetween? With a mustang reading lower i'd expect you trapping nearly 110.

-brent
Is norwalk uphill? Whats up with only trapping 106 when you have 320 "real horsepower"? did you do mods inbetween? With a mustang reading lower i'd expect you trapping nearly 110.

-brent
Never got that one LOL...
The trans WAS slipping!
Oh to be exact it was 105.95 MPH...
Last edited by ZPaul2Fresh8; Apr 16, 2004 at 07:19 PM.
hey guys,
i got my dyno results
1st run= 259.9 max power
2nd run= 261.4 max power
max torque 1st run= 296.1
max torque 2nd run= 286.2
these results don't look good,
please give me your feedback
thanks
i got my dyno results
1st run= 259.9 max power
2nd run= 261.4 max power
max torque 1st run= 296.1
max torque 2nd run= 286.2
these results don't look good,
please give me your feedback
thanks
Almost nailed them...
Put a cam kit in that thing and you will see 310/320 on a Dynojet.
You have to remember, EVERY car is DIFFERENT.
Flywheel about 315hp/350tq
Put a cam kit in that thing and you will see 310/320 on a Dynojet.
You have to remember, EVERY car is DIFFERENT.
Flywheel about 315hp/350tq
Last edited by ZPaul2Fresh8; Apr 16, 2004 at 07:31 PM.



