LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Does this look like valve-float to you?

Old Jan 17, 2007 | 06:04 PM
  #1  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Does this look like valve-float to you?

http://picsorban.com/upload/dynodropoff.jpg

Old Jan 17, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #2  
MeanGreen97Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,523
From: TX
It's definately mechanical. A/F ratio looks perfect and only takes a slight slip when the HP drops off. What all did you replace when you did the heads/cam and how long have they been in there?
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 06:33 PM
  #3  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Originally Posted by MeanGreen97Z
It's definately mechanical. A/F ratio looks perfect and only takes a slight slip when the HP drops off. What all did you replace when you did the heads/cam and how long have they been in there?
I just put in new lifters/rockers/918's,springs/cam, and from what I can tell my installed height is wrong on the springs, but I wanted to get a few second oppinions incase anyone else had a dynograph look like this. The only reason I'm questioning it is I thought valve-float made the dynograph drop off like a cliff, not a 25rwhp dropoff and then hold steady.
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 07:05 PM
  #4  
truedualws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,406
From: Downey, CA
OBD II or OBDI

Are you still running OBDII?

You can do a search of my posts on this topic for more info. I had
the strangest problem that was solved by switching to OBDI.
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 07:08 PM
  #5  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
I have a very similar problem....have yet to figure it out. i'm sure its in the valve train tho,
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 07:19 PM
  #6  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
I just put in new lifters/rockers/918's,springs/cam, and from what I can tell my installed height is wrong on the springs, but I wanted to get a few second oppinions incase anyone else had a dynograph look like this. The only reason I'm questioning it is I thought valve-float made the dynograph drop off like a cliff, not a 25rwhp dropoff and then hold steady.

Up to 5800 it looks like a normal LE/BRE torque curve. Perhaps more valve bounce than float after that. The package was designed to work with a certain installed height/spring load. Get the installed height correct and redyno it.
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 07:51 PM
  #7  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Originally Posted by OldSStroker
Up to 5800 it looks like a normal LE/BRE torque curve. Perhaps more valve bounce than float after that. The package was designed to work with a certain installed height/spring load. Get the installed height correct and redyno it.
The micrometer/shims should be here friday, I just wanted to see if anyone else had the same looking dip on the graph.

Last edited by speed_demon24; Jan 17, 2007 at 08:02 PM.
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 08:02 PM
  #8  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
Have you contacted BRE to see if he thinks the 918's are up to the task. IIRC his lobe profiles are a bit on the aggressive side.
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #9  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
We already talked about it.... and yes the installed height is off and setting up the springs about 15lbs lighter on the seat than what they need to turn the RPM he is doing. Once that's fixed it should be fine.

Bret
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elysian
LT1 Based Engine Tech
43
Nov 22, 2004 07:45 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 AM.