Comp R's
#46
Re: Comp R's
Help me clarify my foggy brain on a couple of things. If the retaining clip is being damaged by an excess of preload, is this due to the fact that the excessive preload causes them, by design, to experience pump up? Otherwise, it would not seem like this would be a problem, within reasonable limits. An 1/8 turn past zero would be barely past .005" on a standard 3/8" fine threaded (24 TPI) rocker stud. That's within their spec, right? Are folks still having problems with them, even then? It would seem that from other things that I've read previously on this problem, as well as here, that although the design might not be optimum, it may just require a more delicate balance. That is to say that overall valvetrain weight, RPM, open spring pressures and even cam profile, as well as preload may need to be more carefully considered. I'm not defending CC here, I do tend to believe they have a problem but just maybe not to the degree as has been reported. Admittedly, I would not purchase them at this point. But if I already had them and there had not been a problem thus far, I would just review all the criteria and keep a good eye on things.
#47
Re: Comp R's
I'm sure this is unimportant in this time of the Comp R lynching phase, but I just bought them in July. They've been in the car for over a thousand miles. Spring pressure is 150lbs closed and 375 open. Engine has been taken up to 6400rpm on numerous occassions. Popped both valve covers off over the weekend and readjusted valves for giggles. All pushrods were uniform when each cylinder was at TDC and all adjusting nuts were at the same position as when they were first adjusted (1/8 turn or approx. .007 preload with my 7/16 studs). This tells me no clips are broken.
Too lazy at this point to take the manifold off. Take it FWIW.
Too lazy at this point to take the manifold off. Take it FWIW.
#48
Re: Comp R's
Originally Posted by SS RRR
I'm sure this is unimportant in this time of the Comp R lynching phase, but I just bought them in July. They've been in the car for over a thousand miles. Spring pressure is 150lbs closed and 375 open. Engine has been taken up to 6400rpm on numerous occassions. Popped both valve covers off over the weekend and readjusted valves for giggles. All pushrods were uniform when each cylinder was at TDC and all adjusting nuts were at the same position as when they were first adjusted (1/8 turn or approx. .007 preload with my 7/16 studs). This tells me no clips are broken.
Too lazy at this point to take the manifold off. Take it FWIW.
Too lazy at this point to take the manifold off. Take it FWIW.
i have these in my car and my wifes daily driven formula.
#49
Re: Comp R's
I have Comp R's (which ones is anybodys guess though) and I'm perfectly happy and confident in them. One thing I'd like to point out, and I believe to be the root cause of most of the failures as others suspect too, is that when I got mine, I asked quite a few people (both here and elsewhere) how to set them up correctly and got so many varying answers and opinions that I finally ended up doing what I should have done in the beginning; READ THE F'in DIRECTIONS COMP PROVIDES! Life's been good ever since...
#51
Re: Comp R's
Comp Rs have been in my LT4 for over 2 years with regular passes to 6500+. No problems as of now. However I do check the lash peridodically as per Comps instructions. These are a race lifter not meant to be in a daily driver. But often as with other performance parts they are often used on the street. Mine are lashed 1/8th of a turn after zero lash.
#52
Re: Comp R's
edit: i erased my previous post due to the fact that i was a little upset when i wrote it and probably came off sounding foolish.
i just got done having over half of my Comp R lifters lose their retaining rings. i spoke with a gentleman at comp cams and we had a heart to heart and i decided that the comp R's for my car, which is used slightly more than track use (no more than 2k miles over the course of 8 months), are not right for what i need. i was informed that the comp R lifters are a very regular maintenance lifter and that they arent necessarily recommended for your vehicle if you cant perform regular tuning on them. for those of you looking for a maintenance free lifter, might i recommend the OEM lifters (comp, crane, etc.) or perhaps a better performance lifter, the morels (all of which i'm sure have been mentioned. just thought i'd reiterate this point). for those of you staying with the comp R's, just keep an eye on them and as the tech mentioned to me, relash them regularly to keep them lashed properly.
i just got done having over half of my Comp R lifters lose their retaining rings. i spoke with a gentleman at comp cams and we had a heart to heart and i decided that the comp R's for my car, which is used slightly more than track use (no more than 2k miles over the course of 8 months), are not right for what i need. i was informed that the comp R lifters are a very regular maintenance lifter and that they arent necessarily recommended for your vehicle if you cant perform regular tuning on them. for those of you looking for a maintenance free lifter, might i recommend the OEM lifters (comp, crane, etc.) or perhaps a better performance lifter, the morels (all of which i'm sure have been mentioned. just thought i'd reiterate this point). for those of you staying with the comp R's, just keep an eye on them and as the tech mentioned to me, relash them regularly to keep them lashed properly.
Last edited by slverbullet; 11-03-2005 at 03:01 PM.
#53
Re: Comp R's
Just put comp r's in my car a few months ago. No problems so far. Set them with a very slight pre load cold. Started the car up, drove it down the road, and got it nice and warmed up. Re set them to 0 lash after motor warmed up.
#54
Re: Comp R's
Originally Posted by foggedz
Just put comp r's in my car a few months ago. No problems so far. Set them with a very slight pre load cold. Started the car up, drove it down the road, and got it nice and warmed up. Re set them to 0 lash after motor warmed up.
#56
Re: Comp R's
Originally Posted by JustNO
all the timee??? How can this be especially with a daily drive car?
Morel is the best.
Morel is the best.
#57
Re: Comp R's
Originally Posted by slverbullet
because, according to the tech at comp cams, these lifters are not designed to be used on a daily driver.
Its been proven time and time again the stock lifters work just fine so why are people still bitching?
#58
Re: Comp R's
Originally Posted by turbo_Z
Its been proven time and time again the stock lifters work just fine so why are people still bitching?
and call comp if you want an explanation to your "thats bull" theory. i'm tired of worrying about it. the only thing the guy told me was that the new design R's are an off-road use only lifter that requires constant maintenance. something about the design allows them to pump up during high rpms that makes them react similar to a solid lifter. and that they have a very low tolerance for not being lashed correctly.
Last edited by slverbullet; 11-14-2005 at 05:19 PM.
#59
Re: Comp R's
Originally Posted by slverbullet
the technician explained to me that if you want to keep them in good working order, you need to be re-lashing them all the time. especially if your car is a daily driver (which they are not intended for). either keep up on them or its only a matter of time before you start losing clips.
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Comp R's
Originally Posted by foggedz
My car is by no means a daily driver. Maybe 2-3k a year.