LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

CC305 or XE 224/230

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 08:55 PM
  #1  
JJ's95B4C's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 239
From: Miami, Fl
CC305 or XE 224/230

I was pretty sure that I was going to get the CC305. The reason for this was that it would be a very streetable cam for a daily driver. With the new deal Combination Motorsports is offering, i started thinking about that cam. I need it to keep decent vacume and gas mileage. What is the difference between these two cams? Is this a good cam for a daily driver, or might it be too big? I was also thinking of the 218/224, but am not sure about either cam now. Please help!
Thanks,

JJ
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
Rodrigues's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,842
From: Bloomfield Hills MI
The cc305 is a little nicer to the valvetrain while the cc503 has steeper ramps and a lower LSA. It is really up to you...
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 09:30 PM
  #3  
JJ's95B4C's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 239
From: Miami, Fl
I was hoping to try and get either cam on a 114 lsa. I don't want it to sound like I have a huge cam in there and i want it to idle decent.
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 09:37 PM
  #4  
BAD97SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 279
From: Langhorne, Pa.
I have the 224/230 cam and love it. I will say it does eat alot of gas, But that can be my setup. You will need tuning with these cams. I know people will say you can go with stock tuning but I throw all kinds of check eng. lights and it idled way low. And they do sound mean.
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 09:52 PM
  #5  
jonaddis84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,639
From: Toledo, OH
Definitely sounds mean *** hell, but doesnt sound like its gonna stall on ya, just sounds like it can kick the *** of every other car on the road. I have no vacuum probs with braking, the power steering is a little tough on a cold morning right away. Ive been driving on stock tune for 2 weeks and its fine, I know Im in for a shock once I get it tuned though. All around its great cam, I have a sound clip in another thread, search for 224/230 and youll find it.
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 10:09 PM
  #6  
JJ's95B4C's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 239
From: Miami, Fl
I've heard the soundlips...their bad *** on both of them. I have LT1 edit so tuning is no problem. I have a tune for a CC305 though that someone sent me by email once, so thats a big plus.
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 10:14 PM
  #7  
JJ's95B4C's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 239
From: Miami, Fl
Originally posted by BAD97SS
I have the 224/230 cam and love it. I will say it does eat alot of gas, But that can be my setup. You will need tuning with these cams. I know people will say you can go with stock tuning but I throw all kinds of check eng. lights and it idled way low. And they do sound mean.
What type of gas mileage are you getting?

What type of gas mileage is everyone else getting with either the cc305 or the xe 224/230
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 10:26 PM
  #8  
BAD97SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 279
From: Langhorne, Pa.
I'm getting about 190 miles to a tank. I have a 2800 stall converter (a4) with 3.73 gears. I'm working on the tuning with edit and it was worse with stock tuning.
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 10:38 PM
  #9  
JJ's95B4C's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 239
From: Miami, Fl
Damm...thats more or less what i'm getting now, depending on how much traffic I get!
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 12:32 AM
  #10  
PredatorZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 749
From: cali,chino
190miles street or highway? what about passing smog with that 224/230 without tuning?or maybe a mail tune
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 05:21 PM
  #11  
BAD97SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 279
From: Langhorne, Pa.
I get 190 highway miles. Like I said it is probably 3.73's and the converter too. As for passing it on stock tuning, I don't think it would pass. It runs kinda rich on that tuning. Mail tune would definently help. I use LT1edit for my tuning and have no problems passing. I am very please with this cam and would recommend it to anybody. It sounds good and preformed just as well.
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 05:32 PM
  #12  
neil350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,670
From: T E X A S
I'm going to be running the CC305, I know that one will pass for sure, no mater what type as long as its tuned right. I sorta like the bad nasty cam sound, I think thats what I'm realy after. I just love the sound of a cam'd car.
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 08:04 PM
  #13  
roman95z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 24
From: Wellington, New Zealand
neil350,

do you mean to say that you have passed NJ emmisions (IM240) with the 224/230 (112 LSA), using LT1-edit. I've read a number of posts regarding this and untill now I haven't heard from anyone directly, saying they've passed (all been heresay). I think there's a guy (Rich) on the board who has it on 114LSA that has passed. Nice one, thats great to know.

Cheers Roman
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 09:56 PM
  #14  
neil350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,670
From: T E X A S
The CC305 will pass NJ emsions or any for that matter, as long as it's tunned. Just look at the GMHTP 93 Formula 396, shorties, CC305 cam, pass' NJ smog just fine. I dont know about the other cam, people have passed non roller tests with CC306s, ChrisB did. But they lean it out and run the car hot, some thing i do not want to do. Rollers a whole different ball game, i got a buddy who just got a failry large cam, hes going to try and see if he can pass smog, Harris county were I live is now smogging on rollers, just like NJ.

Last edited by neil350; Mar 6, 2003 at 10:00 PM.
Old Mar 7, 2003 | 08:13 AM
  #15  
Perry93TransAm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 265
From: Kingfisher,Oklahoma
I have the CC305 on my 93 along with AFR 190cc heads a 3000 vigilantee, 3.73 rear gears, 32 # injectors and 52mm t/B (motor is a 355 w/ 11:1). Last summer I drove from Oklahoma to Orlando Florida in this car and got an average on the interstate of 21.6 MPG. This was continuous 75 mph driving. Now when I drive around town or have my foot in it ,it gets very bad mileage...lol. I also knock down low 12s inthe 1/4 with a full weight leather equiped T/A in the summer heat.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.