cc305 to cc306, worth it?
Originally posted by Josh-'97 WS6
I agree, but it's worth mentioning that you can't run anymore seat pressure with stock roller rockers or you run the risk of collapsing the lifter.
I think the Comp R lifters can handle a little more seat pressure than the stockers if I'm not mistaken.
I agree, but it's worth mentioning that you can't run anymore seat pressure with stock roller rockers or you run the risk of collapsing the lifter.
I think the Comp R lifters can handle a little more seat pressure than the stockers if I'm not mistaken.
If you collapse a lifter, it was worn out to begin with.
Mike
Originally posted by engineermike
I'm using 145 lb seat pressure, 420 open with the stock lifters.
If you collapse a lifter, it was worn out to begin with.
Mike
I'm using 145 lb seat pressure, 420 open with the stock lifters.
If you collapse a lifter, it was worn out to begin with.
Mike
Or maybe TPIS just plays it safe, which is probably the case.
You're right, the 1.6 rockers apply more more force to the lifter than 1.5 rockers with the same valvespring.
However, the better LS1 cam packages use 145 lb seat pressure and 1.7 rockers. That tells me that my 1.6 intake rockers are directionally safer than the LS1 stuff.
I had a long conversation about this subject with one of Comp Cams' area rep's (not the minimum wage guy that gives out cam recommendations over the phone), who told me about an Asphalt Track motor (700+ hp small block), which uses 220 lb seat pressure and 600+ lb open. They ran it on the Spin-Tron (spins the valvetrain to 10,000 rpm and uses a strobe to measure flex, float, etc. . .) with the solid roller. Then, they replaced the solid lifters with hydraulic rollers and everything worked fine.
Mike
However, the better LS1 cam packages use 145 lb seat pressure and 1.7 rockers. That tells me that my 1.6 intake rockers are directionally safer than the LS1 stuff.
I had a long conversation about this subject with one of Comp Cams' area rep's (not the minimum wage guy that gives out cam recommendations over the phone), who told me about an Asphalt Track motor (700+ hp small block), which uses 220 lb seat pressure and 600+ lb open. They ran it on the Spin-Tron (spins the valvetrain to 10,000 rpm and uses a strobe to measure flex, float, etc. . .) with the solid roller. Then, they replaced the solid lifters with hydraulic rollers and everything worked fine.
Mike
Originally posted by engineermike
I had a long conversation about this subject with one of Comp Cams' area rep's (not the minimum wage guy that gives out cam recommendations over the phone), who told me about an Asphalt Track motor (700+ hp small block), which uses 220 lb seat pressure and 600+ lb open. They ran it on the Spin-Tron (spins the valvetrain to 10,000 rpm and uses a strobe to measure flex, float, etc. . .) with the solid roller. Then, they replaced the solid lifters with hydraulic rollers and everything worked fine.
Mike
I had a long conversation about this subject with one of Comp Cams' area rep's (not the minimum wage guy that gives out cam recommendations over the phone), who told me about an Asphalt Track motor (700+ hp small block), which uses 220 lb seat pressure and 600+ lb open. They ran it on the Spin-Tron (spins the valvetrain to 10,000 rpm and uses a strobe to measure flex, float, etc. . .) with the solid roller. Then, they replaced the solid lifters with hydraulic rollers and everything worked fine.
Mike
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
colts0455
LT1 Based Engine Tech
18
Sep 2, 2015 12:41 PM
mark0006
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Aug 29, 2015 09:45 AM



