LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

cam lopeyness

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:03 PM
  #16  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 609
From: Quad Cities
Re: cam lopeyness

If you went with the 306 and a nice set of ported heads you would be over that 360 mark. The 847 would get you 360 and much more I believe. Im probably going to see 340~350rwhp with stock heads and the 306 (that tends to be the norm from what Ive seen)
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:07 PM
  #17  
MY91Y84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 573
From: Just outside of "D-town"
Re: cam lopeyness

heres a short idle movie of my 224/230...

http://www.pnw3.org/fcrazy/IdleMovie.MPG
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:08 PM
  #18  
Z95m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,070
From: newton, kansas, USA
Re: cam lopeyness

Originally Posted by Mike44Mike
O and by the way your camaro is the nicest looking camaro I have seen. I actually was looking at your car on car domain last week and thought it was incredible. And now I find out were actually posting together... I wouldnt have even guessed it was you if you didnt have that link to your Z in your sig.
Thank you very much. To get 400rwhp you really need a bigger cam than a hot cam. 400rwhp isn't that uncommon on here. I need to go back to the dyno but i hope to be close to that. Good ported heads with a 230/236, GM847, CC306 or a good custom cam will get you very close or 400rwhp. www.advancedinduction.com has several cars listed on his site with 400+rwhp on stock shortblocks with heads and cam. Some of them with shortie headers. Good ported heads and a hotcam will get you 350+rwhp. Asing if you can run low 12's is kind of a loaded question. That depends on traction, driving skill, race weight as well as hp.
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #19  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 609
From: Quad Cities
Re: cam lopeyness

to put your mind at ease..I am daily driving the 306 and I love it...

3:42s and a 2200 stall.. no complaints..and Im still untuned
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #20  
96formulaLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 85
From: Kansas
Re: cam lopeyness

it seems like you want a magic cam that gives good fuel milage, makes great power all across the RPM band, and has a radical lope. there is no magic cam that can do that. if you want to maximize power across the RPM range, get your heads flowed and get a cam custom ground to those flow numbers.
if you want 400RWHP, then you need to talk to either Advanced Induction or Lloyd Elliot. they both have head/cam packages proven to make 400+RWHP. just remember that along with it comes supporting mods, headers, rocker arms, new clutch/stall converter, rear end, and a nice computer tune. its not cheap. if you are just looking for a cam that you can throw into a basically stock motor with minimal mods (headers, catback, cold air) i would look at the 218/224 or the hotcam.

if all you care about is lope, throw a GM847 cam in there and a good tune and lope away.

Last edited by 96formulaLT1; Oct 20, 2004 at 11:25 PM.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:56 AM
  #21  
30696bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,013
From: dalton Ga.
Re: cam lopeyness

Select cam because of sound , that's funny...............cause that's what I did!! I can understand why you want the sound. As you can see in the sig, I have the cc306. I LOVE the cams power and sound. Most say it has no power down low but I don't see how they figure that. It may be that my stall (converter) is helping me to get to the power band I don't know but it has VERY good bottom end for me.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 09:24 AM
  #22  
eagleknight97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,495
From: Westmont, IL
Re: cam lopeyness

It seems to me like you have in a sense, contradicted yourself. You originally wanted a cam that had an awesome lope, which I totally understand, theres nothing like it. However, then you say you want to get low 12's with a cam. Based on that criteria, the cam with the best sound isnt necessarily going to get you there. And then you throw ported heads into the mix. It seems like you are jumping all over the place. If you have originally posted that you wanted a cam that worked well with ported heads, gave good power, wasnt too horrible on gas, and had a good sound, some of the answers you got might be different. Custom cams are the way to go if you are getting your heads ported. They are customized to your heads, plus, you can request certain traits you want in your cam.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 09:43 AM
  #23  
30thannZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 515
From: jacksonville, FL
Re: cam lopeyness

I have the XE comp 233/239 112lsa cam and it chops pretty nicely. sounds good through the hooker catback and longtubes as well.

just my $0.02.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 01:07 PM
  #24  
mebanditws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 622
From: Nashville, TN
Re: cam lopeyness

First off Mike, you never want to buy a cam based solely on sound. If you do, you'll go to big and not have any power except in higher rpms with no torque down low and alot of cam surge. A lopey car sounds awesome, especially on true dual cars dumped at the axle. Since you want a cam that gives good power at lower rpms, you are not going to want a 306 or an 847. Even with a good tune, they'll still surge and not have much below 2500. Some people don't mind, me being one of those. If you're looking for that lopey sound, go with a middle of the road cam and set your idle at around 700rpm. That said, I bet you'll be very happy with a Comp XE 224/230. You'll have a nice broad power band and still pull well a little past 6k.

Jason
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:13 PM
  #25  
MY91Y84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 573
From: Just outside of "D-town"
Re: cam lopeyness

Originally Posted by mebanditws6
First off Mike, you never want to buy a cam based solely on sound. If you do, you'll go to big and not have any power except in higher rpms with no torque down low and alot of cam surge. A lopey car sounds awesome, especially on true dual cars dumped at the axle. Since you want a cam that gives good power at lower rpms, you are not going to want a 306 or an 847. Even with a good tune, they'll still surge and not have much below 2500. Some people don't mind, me being one of those. If you're looking for that lopey sound, go with a middle of the road cam and set your idle at around 700rpm. That said, I bet you'll be very happy with a Comp XE 224/230. You'll have a nice broad power band and still pull well a little past 6k.

Jason

That sounds exactly like my car...exhaust and all...its get a pretty choopy/lopey idle and itll run cold at 500 rpms untill it gets up to temp then it idle at 750...the link is above a few posts
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:20 PM
  #26  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Re: cam lopeyness

Is it considered a big cam when you can count the cylinders firing at an 1100 RPM idle?
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #27  
mattybz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 408
From: Charleston, SC
Re: cam lopeyness

no.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:36 PM
  #28  
SS MPSTR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,525
From: SoCal
Re: cam lopeyness

Originally Posted by mattybz28
no.
How about something with durations larger than 250* @ 0.050"? That considered a big cam to you?

Last edited by SS MPSTR; Oct 21, 2004 at 05:39 PM.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:38 PM
  #29  
Mike44Mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39
From: San Jose CA
Re: cam lopeyness

Can you guys compare and contrast the hotcam and the xe 224/230 compare sound and performance. (both on 112LSA)
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:58 PM
  #30  
mattybz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 408
From: Charleston, SC
Re: cam lopeyness

Originally Posted by SS MPSTR
How about something with durations larger than 250* @ 0.050"? That considered a big cam to you?
Tiny.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.