Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
#16
Re: Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
Originally Posted by Jameslt1TA
305 and hotcam = waste of time in my opinion unless you want a car that idles about like stock and doesn't have as much potention. I know people have gone far on them and they are good cams but the 306 is better and with a good tune it will be fairly tame but still provide a very nice lumpy idle. Oh ya and stay the hell away from those xe grinds i hated my old 230/236 my new setup will be with a 306.
Made 302/304 pulling to 5450 on STOCK manifolds and tuned to a 112lsa cam. Torque was above 300 from 2000 to the end of the pull. I had LITTLE cam surge at 1200 rpms and ABSOLUTELY NONE in 5th and 6th gear at ANY rpm... It sounded pretty good, didn't lope crazy, but all I had aftermarket on my exhaust was a loudmouth catback.
#17
Re: Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
Originally Posted by Jameslt1TA
305 and hotcam = waste of time in my opinion unless you want a car that idles about like stock and doesn't have as much potention. I know people have gone far on them and they are good cams but the 306 is better and with a good tune it will be fairly tame but still provide a very nice lumpy idle. Oh ya and stay the hell away from those xe grinds i hated my old 230/236 my new setup will be with a 306.
#18
Re: Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
Sorry if i affended anybody about the xe grinds. I think its mostly just the 230/236 that has gave people problems. Mine wouldn't pull at all past 6k and it was supposed to be a good top end pull cam. At about 5k was were it would peak and then it would keep going at about the same rate untill 6k were it fell flat on its face.
#19
Re: Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
Originally Posted by Jameslt1TA
Sorry if i affended anybody about the xe grinds. I think its mostly just the 230/236 that has gave people problems. Mine wouldn't pull at all past 6k and it was supposed to be a good top end pull cam. At about 5k was were it would peak and then it would keep going at about the same rate untill 6k were it fell flat on its face.
#20
Re: Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
I run the CC305. With stock manifolds it idles like stock almost. Vacuum level is good, compatible with stock PCM settings. The hotcam has slightly rougher idle.
#21
Re: Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
Originally Posted by Bersaglieri
If you are considering doing just the cam and nothing more you'll want to talk to Bret Bauer AKA SStrokerAce. He makes custom cams on this board for members, including Lloyds packages. He is the camshaft voodoo Doctor.
-Dustin-
-Dustin-
#22
Re: Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
Originally Posted by ChrisUlrich
I loved my XE 227/233 on a 114lsa.
Made 302/304 pulling to 5450 on STOCK manifolds and tuned to a 112lsa cam.
Made 302/304 pulling to 5450 on STOCK manifolds and tuned to a 112lsa cam.
#23
Re: Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
Originally Posted by Revis_Racing
I run the CC305. With stock manifolds it idles like stock almost. Vacuum level is good, compatible with stock PCM settings. The hotcam has slightly rougher idle.
#24
Re: Cam lobe separation degrees, difference from 112 to 114?!
Originally Posted by Z95m6
Ditto that. My cam from Bret is awesome, smaller than my old XE and makes way more torque. The car also has great drivability.
-Dustin-
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM