LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Buying a camaro, bit of help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 07:12 PM
  #1  
MadOnion's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
Buying a camaro, bit of help

Hello,

I'm thinking about buying a Camaro. I'm looking to spend less than 7,000.
There is a 95 Z28 TTops in the paper right now for 6,500.

Is there any particular year I should look for, or avoid?

If anyone has a url of a site with pictures to compare the different years or models, that would help.

Any advice would be Great!
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 07:22 PM
  #2  
MadOnion's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
Anyone?
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 07:26 PM
  #3  
Lowend's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 113
From: Los Altos, CA, USA
93 is generally to be avoided for three reasons

1) It had a Speed-Density system rather and a MAF. Its much less accurate than the MAF systems and harder to tune since is uses an E-PROM computer

2) It has an unvented Opti-spark. These units are generally not very dependable. In '95 GM went to a vented unit which is more durable

3) The T56 manual transmission that year is not as strong as other years.

Its generally agreed that '95 is the best year because it has all the updates (except the dash) but does not have OBDII
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 08:00 PM
  #4  
BOWTYDE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 407
From: Home: Roseville, CA School: Chico, CA
95 Is arguably the best year. I'm sure you can do a search to find out why otherwise I can inlighten you.
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 01:21 AM
  #5  
BigBlue95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 252
From: Central IL
I would have to agree that 95 would be the best year. I like the gauges and dash better than the newer ones. The best is the ODB1. 93 is the year to avoid. They don't have the MAF, vented opti(neither does 94), and I'm pretty sure that something about the exhaust manifolds are diff(not as good). Along with those reasons, and the fact that I own one is the reasons to get a 95!
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 01:29 AM
  #6  
jimbo95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 351
From: College Station, Tx
I have also heard from many that 95 is the best year to get a LT1. They have a slightly larger camshaft stock, and come with pretty much the best of both worlds. I got mine based on the fact that I wanted a white 6spd with cloth and t-tops, the fact that it was a 95 was just a bonus. Good luck getting it.
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 03:53 PM
  #7  
MadOnion's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
Thanks for the info...

What do you think the price of a 95 w/ TTops/Convertible would be? With average to high milage?
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 04:11 PM
  #8  
tkatchev69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 156
Ha ha, I think in this forum, you must be more specific about "average to high mileage."
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 04:14 PM
  #9  
SloMofo's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,029
From: NJ
we need more details on the car
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 04:21 PM
  #10  
MadOnion's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
81,000
No problems w/ the interior or exterior
everything runs good
Stock
95 Z28
Auto
TTops

(also, how much more do you think a convertible w/ 6spd would be?)
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 05:02 PM
  #11  
MadOnion's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
bump
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 05:05 PM
  #12  
SloMofo's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,029
From: NJ
Originally posted by MadOnion
81,000
No problems w/ the interior or exterior
everything runs good
Stock
95 Z28
Auto
TTops

(also, how much more do you think a convertible w/ 6spd would be?)
$6k or so would be a good price for that car in today's market.

What, if anything, has been replaced on the car?
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 05:12 PM
  #13  
MadOnion's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6
A water pump awhile ago.

Would a ragtop be much more $?
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 05:17 PM
  #14  
Donny O's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 214
From: Edgerton Wi.
convertibles do seem to go for a bit more from what I have seen.....for the same car your talkign about I would say no more than a grand more.....but i'm no expert jsut going from my observations!!
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 05:35 PM
  #15  
96 TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 440
From: Charelston, SC
I think that if your looking to mod your car and take it to the track that you shouldn't be looking at a conv. They are heaiver, twist more and it's just one more thing to have break. Other then that their great
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Jan 4, 2015 08:43 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Dec 28, 2014 02:25 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
Dec 21, 2014 09:47 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
Dec 15, 2014 03:09 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
2
Dec 7, 2014 06:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 PM.