Brake pad wear
18,000 is extremely low for front pads. It is not uncommon at all for the fronts to last more than 50k miles. Heck, my 94Z has 72k miles on it and the front pads have not been changed! The rears have but not the fronts. The rears on these cars wear out much faster than the fronts.
But, I'm basing this on normal driving. 120 mph daily isn't really normal (at least for most here in the states!) so that may or may not be normal wear for your conditions! However, if the fronts are lasting only 18k then the rears should only be lasting about 10k. Is that the case?
But, I'm basing this on normal driving. 120 mph daily isn't really normal (at least for most here in the states!) so that may or may not be normal wear for your conditions! However, if the fronts are lasting only 18k then the rears should only be lasting about 10k. Is that the case?
Originally posted by predator
i am confused i have only changed my rears like every 20 or so they dont do any work
i am confused i have only changed my rears like every 20 or so they dont do any work
I think if a poll is taken that you'll find here in the USA people go through rear brakes considerably faster than fronts. Granted, the fronts are bigger and do most of the work, but the rears wear out faster... here
This has been talked about several times over the past several years and the majority change rears much more often than fronts. Yes, very strange
At the risk of being totally wrong, I have heard or read that our cars have an anti-dive bias to the rear and that us folks that don't do much aggressive braking will wear rears must faster than fronts.
Believe me, after three pairs of evenly worn rears, and still the stock fronts at 120,000 miles I was asking questions.
Kinda funny story, after I changed the rears for the second time, I was convinced that I had a braking "system" problem. So my friend suggests we get it up to 100+ and "slam" on the brakes to see how much the fronts were working. What did we learn? Perfectly functioning Z28 brakes at 100+ MPH slammed = seat belt friction burns and bruises for 2 passengers
Brake test = passed
I believe the dealer told me about the anti-dive information, so take it for what it is worth. What is true is that normal day-to-day driving eats rear pads very quickly on brakes that seem fully functional.
Sean
Believe me, after three pairs of evenly worn rears, and still the stock fronts at 120,000 miles I was asking questions.
Kinda funny story, after I changed the rears for the second time, I was convinced that I had a braking "system" problem. So my friend suggests we get it up to 100+ and "slam" on the brakes to see how much the fronts were working. What did we learn? Perfectly functioning Z28 brakes at 100+ MPH slammed = seat belt friction burns and bruises for 2 passengers
Brake test = passed
I believe the dealer told me about the anti-dive information, so take it for what it is worth. What is true is that normal day-to-day driving eats rear pads very quickly on brakes that seem fully functional.
Sean
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jul 17, 2015 02:47 PM



