LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

best cam for a non track street LT1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 07:11 AM
  #16  
user 647483's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
H/C install shopping list
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2297151/4
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 09:12 AM
  #17  
mzgp5x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,174
From: MI
Crane cam 2050.. 218/218 .498/.498 lift on 155 deg Lsa. Nice idle and high rpm rev's. Requires new valve springs $109.00. Worked very good with a p600b ATI.
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 10:23 AM
  #18  
Mauiguyy911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 276
From: Tallahassee & Jupiter,FL
Originally Posted by James Montigny
H/C install shopping list
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2297151/4
Will that list also work with the entire LE1 setup (heads/cam), as I noticed you have the LE2 heads?
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #19  
user 647483's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Originally Posted by Mauiguyy911
Will that list also work with the entire LE1 setup (heads/cam), as I noticed you have the LE2 heads?
The castings are identical (GM LT1)
Everything that is different (springs, valves, etc..) is included with the heads.

I selected LE2 heads for my setup based advice I received from Bret.
He said that the LE2 heads are the best bang for the buck and
that he had see seen them make 15-20hp over a LE1 head in the same setups.
That, coupled with the better components.

I went with the LE1HL (high-lift) cam because I didn't want the lope of the LE2 cam, but I wanted a little more than the LE1 offerd.
It's my DD, and it certainly does lope (and turns heads). If you don't like that, stick with the LE1 cam.

I also had Lloyd port my manifold to match the heads, which is optional.

The thin head gaskets gave me a slightly higher compression ratio, which was good for 5-8hp.
That's why I used 7.150" pushrods instead of the standard 7.20"

Last edited by user 647483; Jan 23, 2007 at 10:45 AM.
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 12:04 PM
  #20  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
Would you reccomend going with the thinner head gaskets? The reason my car is in the shop now is because of a blown head gasket and I would think a thinner one would be weaker.
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #21  
user 647483's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Originally Posted by buzz12586
Would you reccomend going with the thinner head gaskets? The reason my car is in the shop now is because of a blown head gasket and I would think a thinner one would be weaker.
I don't think that is the case at all.

What happened to the old gasket? (Why did it fail?)
Typically overheating, improper installation, detonation, etc ...
Was there any damage to the heads or block that required machining?

Last edited by user 647483; Jan 23, 2007 at 12:14 PM.
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #22  
buzz12586's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
From: Charlotte, NC
It overheated about 3 weeks before the headgasket went. Not sure about damage yet, the motor should be pulled out tomorrow.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Louey
Pacific
1
Jan 25, 2015 12:22 AM
Louey
Pacific
1
Dec 25, 2014 03:27 AM
Louey
Pacific
0
Dec 8, 2014 08:01 PM
Louey
Pacific
1
Nov 28, 2014 03:46 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.