any truth to this? or just a misinformed vette guy?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 125
From: Bugtussle, PA - a suburb of Pittsburgh
there's a guy I talk to at the track once in a while...he has I believe a '95 vette. It's an LT1 with a similar level of mods to me. He runs a lil slower than me though for some reason. anyway...
Yesterday he showed me that he got some 1.6 roller rockers. I asked how much that set him back, he said whatever, $250 or so for the rockers, and $400ish for the install
. I asked why he didn't just install em himself...cuz just looking at it, the engine is so easy to get to, and you could prolly have the valve covers off in 5 minutes. He said "any time you disturb the valvetrain like that you can throw your timing off, and you hafta line up the #1 cylinder again or it'll misfire on you"
. I said "uhh...if you're talking valve timing, the cam and crank are synchronized by your timing belt, you're not gonna throw that off by changing rockers...and spark timing goes by the signal from the opti, which is also unaffected by your rockers". He insisted that switching rockers would throw your timing off. Unless he's just saying you hafta set the valve lash right, but that's no big deal...so is he dumb, or am I?
Yesterday he showed me that he got some 1.6 roller rockers. I asked how much that set him back, he said whatever, $250 or so for the rockers, and $400ish for the install
. I asked why he didn't just install em himself...cuz just looking at it, the engine is so easy to get to, and you could prolly have the valve covers off in 5 minutes. He said "any time you disturb the valvetrain like that you can throw your timing off, and you hafta line up the #1 cylinder again or it'll misfire on you"
. I said "uhh...if you're talking valve timing, the cam and crank are synchronized by your timing belt, you're not gonna throw that off by changing rockers...and spark timing goes by the signal from the opti, which is also unaffected by your rockers". He insisted that switching rockers would throw your timing off. Unless he's just saying you hafta set the valve lash right, but that's no big deal...so is he dumb, or am I?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 125
From: Bugtussle, PA - a suburb of Pittsburgh
Originally posted by aggiez28
chain not belt
chain not belt

yeah, I figgered I was right...this guy does tend to be a bit misinformed...I mean jeez...how ya gonna throw your timing off by...ehh, I don't wanna think about it, it'll make my head hurt
I sort of understand what this guy was trying to tell you.
Tightening RRs on the LT1 is different than LS1. The LT1s require you to rotate the crank to make sure all valves are closed when tightening the RRs... this is a very simplistic explanation mind you.
The LS1s, I tighten to 22 ft.lbs crank the motor a bit then retighten.
Tightening RRs on the LT1 is different than LS1. The LT1s require you to rotate the crank to make sure all valves are closed when tightening the RRs... this is a very simplistic explanation mind you.
The LS1s, I tighten to 22 ft.lbs crank the motor a bit then retighten.
I know 1.6 RR's give a HP increase but aren't they detrimental to pushrods over time due to the angle of the valvetrain being altered and run a risk of breaking a pushrod? Or am I misinformed?
Myles
Myles



