96 SS stock CAI vs K&N CAI...

Subscribe
Aug 10, 2003 | 06:30 PM
  #1  
My 96 SS still has it's stock cold air from SLP... however I really doubt how effective it is since it does a 180 into the TB... and I think most air runs over the hood scoop and is not "rammed" in there anyways, so I'm thinking of switching to the K&N CAI... Would it be worth the money to get this? Or does the stock one work better than I think? I've never seen any pictures of anyone who still has it.. they have all seemed to switch to something or other that runs to the fender. Plus I think it cleans up the engine bay anyways.. so does the K&N cai work much better than the stock? Thanks

Trevor
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 07:56 PM
  #2  
lol wow... back 8 pages already lol

hmmm anyone have any advice? Thanks

Trevor
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 08:06 PM
  #3  
They are all about the same, so there is no point in switching from one to the other. Just my opinion.
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 08:07 PM
  #4  
I don't think the gains would warrant the money spent. You might see 5 rwhp. The LT1 SS ram air setup isn't quite as convaluted and crappy as the LS1 setup.
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 08:11 PM
  #5  
Really? The LS1 set up is crap? I always though it was much better....

Well thanks.. great, that saves me some money that I can put into something else now

Oh btw... since the intake does like a 180 into the TB... would buying an air foil in an attempt to straighten that out as much as possible be worth it? I don't know if air foils are BS or not... thanks

Trevor
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #6  
Airfoils are a waste of money. Period.

The reason the LS1 setup sucks is because the air gets split into two different tracks in the hood and that both make 360* turns and then through the airbox. I guess the only difference would be that the LT1 cars have the airbox before the bend and the LS1 has the airbox after the bends.
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 08:18 PM
  #7  
Oh.. well then everything just seems to be dropping of my "to buy" list.. now the only I'm buying are my FLP long tube header set up... so now that I have all this extra money kicking around... any suggestions on what would be worth my time and money to go with my headers?
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 08:25 PM
  #8  
I'd say go with some 4.10 gears.
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 08:29 PM
  #9  
I thought gears would be the next thing on the list.. thanks.. I'll start looking into it

Trevor
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 09:40 PM
  #10  
do suspension stuffs, that's what i would do if i were you
Reply
Aug 11, 2003 | 10:58 PM
  #11  
SS ram air
I swithched mine to a Moroso CAI because I had my intake powder coated and wanted to see more of the motor. It was also starting to crack and I don't think it ever sealed right to the hood. I had a K&N filter in the SS airbox in place of the factory filter. I always felt like the ram air worked judging by the amount of dirt and crud in the filter. As far as any horepower of et gains I don't think I gained or lost anything. If I didn't get the cai for next to nothing I would still be running the stock box. I also wanted to keep the stock ramair box in as good of shape as possible just in case these cars are worth something in the future.
Reply
Aug 12, 2003 | 08:05 AM
  #12  
im still using mine. im happy with it, plus it gets alot of looks when the hoods open
Reply
Aug 12, 2003 | 10:32 AM
  #13  
IIRC, Jason Debler got a pretty decent gain in power when he put a K&N FIPK on his old 96SS.
Reply
Aug 12, 2003 | 11:40 AM
  #14  
My car made 452rwhp with a 383 and the SS airbox. I don't think it's much of a restriction.
Reply
Aug 12, 2003 | 12:32 PM
  #15  
It was proven years ago that the LT1 SS air box setup is costing .2 sec.

Same day at track, switched to a CAI and picked up .2. Same 60' times. Car was hot lapped to see if it was because of sitting. Still was .2 second faster without the stock setup.

Quite a few people back then had the same results.
Reply
Subscribe